Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why did we kidnap Aristede?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 08:20 AM
Original message
Why did we kidnap Aristede?
My first theory was that we did it as an example (the PNAC's favorite tactic to make leaders fall in line with US interests) to Hugo Chavez.

Then I heard a theory that we did it to appease broken ties with the French.

I don't know what to think. My fiance keeps asking why the US would bother with the poorest nation in the hemisphere. One with no (or hardly any) white people. It doesn't add up on the surface.

I know there are people in DU who can enlighten me. Please do. This thing seems big to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. We did it because Levi-Strauss's profits were dropping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dand Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Empire expansion, or....
Cheap labor source, I am not smart enough to figure it out either. How about cannon fodder for our over stretched military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapislzi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. It has not yet been determined that Aristede was "kidnapped"
That's one helluva strong word. I don't know if you heard the WBAI/Pacifica broadcast yesterday morning with Charlie Rangel. He made a point of saying that it was not clear whether Aristede was actually kidnapped. The WBAI interviewer kept repeating the word "kidnapped," but call me a hair-splitter; I am not convinced. I'm not ruling it out, but I'd need to see more evidence that doesn't come out of the mouth of Aristede, who naturally has an axe to grind. And Charlie Rangel has no agenda with regard to Aristede; he was one of the people who tried to help.

We do know he was forced to leave Haiti and forced to resign, escorted in "protective custody" for his own "safety." We also know that he still considers himself the democratically elected sovereign of Haiti.

Haiti was allowed to deteriorate by degrees because it suited the WTO and IMF, both of whom Aristede originally opposed. Aristede was damned by lack of support. At least that's my understanding. Other DUers with more in-depth knowledge of the region will no doubt fill you in here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supercrash Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. ?
You said he might have NOT been kidnapped....

Then you say..."We do know he was forced to leave"

When you are forced to go somewhere you don't want to...it is kidnapping
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Either way you phrase it - I want to know why
I don't really care what you call it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapislzi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Kidnapping is a very loaded word
as I pointed out in my post.

I can get kicked out of a bar, or dragged out, but that doesn't mean I've been kidnapped.

Aristede was given the choice by the State Department to either leave under armed escort or stay in Haiti with no guarantee with safety. I would concede that the terms were certainly coercive, but I am not convinced that the action amounted to de facto kidnapping.

Give me some more evidence. I'm willing to be persuaded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. I agree with you. Aristide was either going with the those guys or he'd be
dead by now at the hands of his people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Being taken against your will is still called kidnapping
Many kidnappings are done without force and/or weapons. I think US military showing up at my house at 2:00 AM with a helicopter sitting on the front lawn is a pretty strong hint that it's time to go.

If the US didn't take Aristide against his will, then why didn't we give him asylum in the US? And why is he being treated like a prisoner now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapislzi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. 'Cause Aristede is not our man in Port-au-Prince
there is no love lost between Aristede and the corporate government of the U.S. And the last thing Bush would want would be to open the door to pro-Aristede refugees coming in. He already unequivocally stated several weeks ago that NONE would be given asylum. To allow Aristede in would be to suggest that we actually support him, which we emphatically do not.

It has been U.S. policy for decades to keep the region poor and unstable. What do you suppose would happen if places like Puerto Rico started getting ideas about democratically elected leadership?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. Hey, he was lucky that he wasn't a victim of state-sponsored assassination
It's been done before and it will done hereafter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. Interesting that Danziger seems to buy into the Aristide-is-a-twerp line


I wonder why. Normally he seems more perceptive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. To prevent all the haitians from leaving and coming to FL/ ELECTION year
and all..

Can't have a PROBLEM to deal with in FLORIDA with all those votes at stake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StopThief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. To keep him from being shot. . .
and dragged through the streets by the advancing rebel forces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
15. Okay, here's my tinfoil hat theory
I don't think this is a WH mission and I don't think this is an OSP operation either. I think it's some folks in the CIA(?) stirring this mess up in Haiti, to screw Bu$h.

This is a no win situation for Bu$h. Yes, Bu$hCo doesn't like Aristide and refused to support him since 1991 but they would rather pretend Haiti didn't exist and let them all kill themselves. Strategically, we don't need Haiti for a base. There are plenty of others already in the region. Heck if we want to invade Cuba all we have to do is take down the fence at Guantanamo.

The first three weeks, when the unrest started, Bu$hCo didn't even pay attention to what was happening and despite Aristide pleas for help, they put him on ignore. Then when the rebels surrounded the capital we no longer had a choice about getting involved but instead of doing the right thing and protecting Aristide we took the chickenshit way out and gave him the free plane ride instead of letting his own people kill him.

Now we have US troops deployed in Haiti and a misadministration with a leader who only found out that Haiti was in the western hemisphere two weeks ago. When Americans start dying in Haiti right before an election, Bu$h can forget about getting elected dog catcher no less President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Interesting theory
I like it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Plus this will likely start up
the refugee boats again. Right now the Coast Guard is turning them right back to Haiti, but they can't maintain that level of vigilance all the time. Before long some of the boats will get through and end up in Miami and that's something else, that Bu$hCo wants to avoid before the election. At least with Aristide in power the refugee problem was under control.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
16. It's just our compassionate president with his "humble" foriegn policy
Edited on Wed Mar-10-04 09:56 AM by spanone
Never has more bullshit lip-service been heaped upon the folks of this land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC