Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cherie Blair: "Bush 'stole' the presidential election"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:39 AM
Original message
Cherie Blair: "Bush 'stole' the presidential election"
This appeared in the news on Saturday. No doubt someone on DU posted it then, but for those of us without weekend internet access, I thought I'd post it here.

Bush 'stole' the presidential election

PTI< SATURDAY, JANUARY 24, 2004 08:20:21 PM >

LONDON : In a forthright view that is likely to embarrass her husband, Cherie Blair, wife of Prime Minister Tony Blair, is reported to have observed that George W Bush "stole" the US presidential election from Al Gore.

"Cherie Blair still believed that Bush had stolen the White House from Gore," author Philip Stephens wrote in his book "Tony Blair: The Making of a World Leader. "

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/443220.cms

:dem:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Tony Blair actively campaigned for Gore. He was very anti-Bush throughout
2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. My tinfoil hat theory
Bush's manipulation of Blair over Iraq is a deliberate effort to wreck the Labour Party.

Any takers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avonrepus Donating Member (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. i met Cherie Blair
At the 2001 Labour party in Brighton when i was 16, somewhere there is a photo of my friends and her posing LOL. She seemed very friendly.

Also lets not forget, not only did Blair support Clinton, he based his election campaign and his, 'Third Way' on Clinton and the Democrats.

As for the tinfoil hat theory, if the party really thought Blair was going to ruin the party he'd be out the door, just like Thatcher back in Nov 1990. Even still the Conservatives stand virtually no chance of overturning Labour's majority, i mean it took Labour 14 years to overturn the Conservative majority or 145 in 1983 and the Conservatives have gained 2 seats since 1997 against a Labour loss of 6.

Thats my opinion anyways.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IkeWarnedUs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for posting - I found more
I did a Google News search and found there is another story about the book and Mrs. Blair's comments on Bush. I was able to pull the story up under a free link on The Independent Online - Europe, which says it was originally published by The Cape Argus (South Africa). The same story was also published in The Times of London (which you need a subscription to access), Times of India, Melbourne Herald Sun (Australia), and Femail.uk.com.

<snip>

Mrs Blair's refusal to toe the line over her husband's dealings with Bush surfaced when the Blairs were guests of the Bushes for the first time in February 2001.

As they flew to Camp David, says Stephens, "Cherie Blair still believed that Bush had stolen the White House from Democratic candidate Al Gore".

Mrs Blair was uncomfortable with the idea of her husband "cosying up" to Bush. Once the Blairs arrived in America, Cherie kept her views to herself and went out of her way to make friends with Laura Bush. But when the Bushes came to Britain several months later, Mrs Blair could not resist taking on the president.

The conversation turned to the death penalty. Bush, as governor of Texas, had signed more than 150 death warrants, but Mrs Blair, a leading human rights lawyer, bluntly told him executions were immoral and a violation of human rights. The death penalty was, she said, an affront to fundamental principles of justice.

more: http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?click_id=24&art_id=vn20040126104526763C426433&set_id=1

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I would really like to know
why Blair supported the war. It is obvious the Blair's despised Bush...so I wonder what motivated them to do this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I've never heard a good explanation for this
...still mystified. Tony, Tony, Tony. You lie down with AWOL moron dogs, you wind up with fleas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippyleftist Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. bush is a fascist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. If Blaire believes that right or wrong Bush will succeed,
he may just be trying to pick the winning horse. Or he simply values Britains status as America's number one ally above all else. The US does still have some pretty massive power whoever is running it. If Bush and his ilk are in power for terms to come, this could pay off economically for Britain big time. Even if Bush is ousted, Britain can still point to a record of loyalty to us. Sure he may have prefferred to suck up to Gore than to Bush, but he must feel he has to suck up to the president regardless for the good of the status quo in britain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think you're right.
The U.S. is Britains most important ally. Blair would be making a huge mistake to break with the U.S. simply because he disagrees with the current occupant of the White House. It could poison U.S.-U.K. relations for decades to come.

:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC