Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kristol: It's Clinton's Fault! No lie, that's the spin on O'Neill!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Timefortruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 07:34 PM
Original message
Kristol: It's Clinton's Fault! No lie, that's the spin on O'Neill!
Kristol: O'Neill War Memo Came From Clinton

<sikp>
But former White House official Bill Kristol, who now publishes The Weekly Standard, says that a key memo cited by the author that outlines U.S. contingency plans to topple Saddam Hussein goes back to the Clinton administration.

" quotes this secret memo, 'Plan for Post-Saddam Iraq,' that apparently the Bush administration had in its first few months," Kristol told "Fox News Sunday."

"I'm sure that was left over from the Clinton administration. Of course had a plan for post-Saddam Iraq - it's been our policy to have regime change there for three years before the Bush administration."
<more>

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/1/11/115515.shtml

Who else's fault could it be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's why he can say that.
Kristol is the head of PNAC. He wrote a letter to Clinton that was signed by all his PNAC buddies, which was supported by Lieberman, telling him that he had to go to war to change regimes in Iraq in 1998. Clinton's shift to formally endorsing the goal of regime change was the result of this letter. I believe this was also when the inspectors were pulled out of Iraq at the US's request and we started bombing them like mad. But Clinton refused to go to all the way into war over it because there was no public support. (Madeleine Albright and others actually tried to drum up support but failed.) So in a bizarre way, Kristol is right. If Clinton had gone all the way with the PNAC recommendations, instead of just part of the way, * wouldn't have had to do it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. So in other words, Clinton determined that the lack of public support for
the war was a major reason to withdraw from the war plans. That's what Kristol fails to mention. Clinton may have considered it, but he determined that without public support, it was an ill conceived plan. So Bush is still in the wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMiddleRoad Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. The Sitty Part
The Shitty part is that Kristol's buddies were undermining Clinton's authority to lead militarily with all their "Wag the Dog" bullshit over Bosnia.

If Bosnia was "Wag the Dog", then Iraq is "Wag the Elephant".

Oh yeah, and Bosnia worked. Every foreign Military action that Clinton started ultimately worked. Just goes to show you what can happen when you work diplomatically and get your neighbors to help you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thats annoying as hell
Shit, The Clinton Administration also had a point-by-point plan for taking out Al Qeada, but its not like the Bush Administration wanted to follow that.

When are these fucking assholes going to take some responsibility?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. this isn't about one memo
forget for a minute that Kristol is speculating through that whole thing.

O'Neill is describing the administration as actively planning the occupation of Iraq. Not just discussing, not just contingency plans, but actively planning.

I wonder if Ellen Mariani is going to subpoena O'Neill...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes
"O'Neill is describing the administration as actively planning the occupation of Iraq. Not just discussing, not just contingency plans, but actively planning."

And right after running on a 'no nation building' platform, and getting almost a majority of the vote for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. it`s my fault
i`ll take the blame. why? cause i`m a nice guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
are_we_united_yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I don't know why
But I laughed hysterically at your post!!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. There are ALWAYS contingency plans. Always.
I'm sure the US has plans on how to annex Canada, how to stop an invasion of aliens from space, what to do in case someone weaponizes a chicken virus for use in humans.

It doesn't mean they will ever use these plans.

I'm sure there were Clinton-era "plans" to topple Saddam. And Tony Blair. And Jaques Chirac. Et. al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is there nothing Bill can't do?
Even though he is no longer in office, former President Bill Clinton still wields power. A memo that was written during his administration is being blamed for the preemptive strike on Iraq that has left 495 Americans dead. Other memos have been linked to floods, forest fires, and one particular memo that has recently come to light has ominously mentioned Yellowstone park. Stay tuned for further developments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. Damn that Clinton penis!
The Clinton penis wrote that memo! Damn it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
are_we_united_yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. Clinton is a BAD MO FO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC