Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Can't the IRS Do It? -NYT (privatizing tax collection)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 09:57 AM
Original message
Why Can't the IRS Do It? -NYT (privatizing tax collection)
AFTER YEARS of prodding by the Bush administration and a heap of campaign contributions from debt collection companies, Congress has given the Internal Revenue Service clearance to have private debt collectors go after delinquent taxpayers. The temptation is understandable, but it should have been resisted. The IRS -- if it had the resources -- could recover far more money for the Treasury by doing this work itself. And privatizing tax collection, a quintessentially governmental function, could subject taxpayers to abuse and invasion of privacy, no matter how carefully the IRS oversees the program.

The government has a few hundred billion dollars in unpaid back taxes on its books, of which it estimates about $80 billion could be collected. In a sensible world, the IRS would be given enough money to do this job, since the average collection officer brings in about $900,000 annually -- far more than he or she costs the government. But this is not a sensible world, or at least not a sensible government; under perverse budget rules, adding IRS employees shows up only as an outlay. So there's scant prospect that the IRS will get the resources. Should private debt collection agencies fill the void?

This wouldn't be as unusual as you might think. More than 40 states use private collection agencies in their tax programs. The Education Department deploys debt collectors to go after delinquent student loans, and the Treasury Department uses them for other debts. The IRS itself experimented with such a program during the 1990s but found that it cost more than it brought in.

Now a provision buried in the recent corporate tax bill would allow the IRS to try again, with changes designed to make the program more successful than its predecessor. Rather than being paid for their services, the collection agencies would get up to 25 percent of the money. The IRS will outsource the easiest debts to collect -- for example, taxpayers who have acknowledged owing money but failed to write a check for the full amount. The Treasury Department estimates that private debt collectors could bring in an extra $1 billion in 10 years. And the IRS seems to be building sensible oversight and privacy protections into the program. Debt collectors would be bound by the same rules as IRS agents; they couldn't threaten or intimidate taxpayers and wouldn't have access to underlying tax records.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A49804-2004Dec8.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC