Friedman: Two Nations Under God

[kskiska]

Well, as Grandma used to say, at least I still have my health. ...

I often begin writing columns by interviewing myself. I did that yesterday, asking myself this: Why didn't I feel totally depressed after George H. W. Bush defeated Michael Dukakis, or even when George W. Bush defeated Al Gore? Why did I wake up feeling deeply troubled yesterday?

Answer: whatever differences I felt with the elder Bush were over what was the right policy. There was much he ultimately did that I ended up admiring. And when George W. Bush was elected four years ago on a platform of compassionate conservatism, after running from the middle, I assumed the same would be true with him. (Wrong.) But what troubled me yesterday was my feeling that this election was tipped because of an outpouring of support for George Bush by people who don't just favor different policies than I do - they favor a whole different kind of America. We don't just disagree on what America should be doing; we disagree on what America is.

Is it a country that does not intrude into people's sexual preferences and the marriage unions they want to make? Is it a country that allows a woman to have control over her body? Is it a country where the line between church and state bequeathed to us by our Founding Fathers should be inviolate? Is it a country where religion doesn't trump science? And, most important, is it a country whose president mobilizes its deep moral energies to unite us - instead of dividing us from one another and from the world?

(snip)

The election results reaffirmed that. Despite an utterly incompetent war performance in Iraq and a stagnant economy, Mr. Bush held onto the same basic core of states that he won four years ago - as if nothing had happened. It seemed as if people were not voting on his performance. It seemed as if they were voting for what team they were on.

This was not an election. This was station identification. I'd bet anything that if the election ballots hadn't had the names Bush and Kerry on them but simply asked instead, "Do you watch Fox TV or read The New York Times?" the Electoral College would have broken the exact same way.

more…
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/04/opinion/04friedman.html

[Catch22Dem]

1. This line sums it up!

It seemed as if people were not voting on his performance. It seemed as if they were voting for what team they were on.

[Anakin Skywalker]

3. Exactly!

All reasonable, moderate people I have spoken to thought for sure Shrubby would lose simply because he's been horrible at his job. But then, there are always those rednecks who would vote anybody who has an R attached to his name.

[pleiku52cab]

2. Hey Friedman - we are not going "to lapse into a total mess"......

we are already IN a total mess - in the next four years this country may lapse into a total catastrophe - welcome to the BRA (Banana Republic of America)

[teryang]

4. The Republic is dead

We have entered the dictatorship phase. Evoting is a fig leaf for fascism. There is now no check on the power of corporate greed.

[question everything]

5. Excellent. And for those who do not want to register with the NYT

it also appeared on the SDUT http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20041105/news_lz1e5friedman.html