Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brain Study Shows Conservatives Have a 'Caligula Amygdala'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Don Davis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 10:38 PM
Original message
Brain Study Shows Conservatives Have a 'Caligula Amygdala'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great comment.
Edited on Mon Jan-03-11 11:17 PM by RandomThoughts
Helps with last comment on brain box size. It would not be how much you think, but what you think on that would be the better or worse. So Caligula could be an animal by following instinct, not by brain size. From that, ideas of thought constraints on behavior are valued, that is a big part of Greek culture also, ideas of the thinking man. Although some think that means only thinking and make anything fun and impulsive bad, leading to spock culture of no emotion.

So it is not brain box that defines forbidden fruit, and the animal side without heart becomes the bad.

Thanks for the counter argument, I don't agree that having smarts is the forbidden fruit, I think it is how you use it, since judging people by groups that are actually the same, except maybe for a skin color or cultural tradition, they are the same, all people, when looking through heart, so think the fruit of knowledge of good and evil is judgment without smarts or heart, so that forbidden fruit is not that smart, and not about brain box.

Caligula failing was lack of caring. Or he did not want to be emperor and so got lots of bad press, depends if the reports of his cruelty were accurate. Depends if he used coercion to get people to watch his expressions.

Another reason not really worrying if things are read or not is important, another good point. However apposing censorship is different then worrying if your stuff is read. It could be wanting to see many expressions of many people. Or thinking people should be able to freely express their thoughts and feelings.


I am due beer and travel money, so I can watch many people express talents and also to have conversations with people, but not by control or coercion.


Within those concepts, here is the tipping point.

Measure of a Man
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PMlDidyG_I

In metaphor. Photons be free
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC