Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pelosi's Loss; Our Gain (by William Fisher)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Leo 9 Donating Member (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 04:37 PM
Original message
Pelosi's Loss; Our Gain (by William Fisher)
Edited on Tue May-19-09 04:40 PM by Leo 9
May 19, 2009 at 11:12:45

Pelosi's Loss; Our Gain

by William Fisher


Congressional Democrats and many Washington journalists are predicting that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's current dispute with the Central Intelligence Agency may ultimately hasten the push toward the last thing Republicans want -- a comprehensive investigation of prisoner detention and interrogation during the administration of former President George W. Bush.

The Pelosi controversy centers on whether the House's top Democrat was briefed in 2002 by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that waterboarding and other abusive interrogation techniques were being used when she was chair of the House Intelligence Committee.

Pelosi says the CIA told her waterboarding was not being used; she has accused the agency of misleading Congress. The CIA claims it informed her, as well as a small number of other Congressional leaders.

While President Barack Obama appears to be ambivalent about a comprehensive look-back, many of Pelosi's House colleagues - and much of the media -- are ramping up their calls for an independent 9/11-type commission to investigate not only what Pelosi knew and when she knew it, but what happened to detainees during the Bush years.

If there is a full-blown investigation of Bush-era policies, it is sure to drill down into the CIA's activities following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and in the year-long run-up to the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq.

snip

A cornucopia of politically charged information is virtually certain to surface if the Pelosi-CIA contretemps leads to formation of a commission to conduct an independent investigation.

If such a commission is formed, much of its work will likely be conducted behind closed doors. The public may initially learn very little about the details because virtually all the CIA-related material will be classified and it will probably take considerable time for a declassified version of the body's report to become available publicly.

But many in Washington are saying that, even absent an official investigation, much more information about the CIA's detention and interrogation practices is likely to find its way to the media in dribs and drabs.

About which we should all say: Bring it on!"


http://www.opednews.com/articles/Pelosi-s-Loss-Our-Gain-by-William-Fisher-090519-391.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. I certainly wouldn't want a 9/11-type commission if it means no prosecution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leo 9 Donating Member (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That might not be up to just U.S.
Other countries could prosecute, based on whatever evidence is available.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That would be great imo - just like Saddam. How appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC