Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Missouri’s Third Rail: Why The Hancock Amendment Should Be Repealed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
PinkTiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 05:49 PM
Original message
Missouri’s Third Rail: Why The Hancock Amendment Should Be Repealed
http://brendakilby.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/499/

Snip:

How the Hancock Amendment Became Law
The 1970s was a period of massive inflation in the United States, when the price of groceries, durable goods and gasoline skyrocketed. Wages went up too, but not as fast as property values and the tax bill. Property values in Missouri and other states that were reassessed every two years, increased tenfold in eight years. By 1978, when California voters passed Proposition 13, annual inflation was around 13 percent (Lynch, 2009). The push for Proposition 13 received a lot of press coverage, and sparked interest nationwide, and the debate provided imagery most people could relate to easily: “the fast-rising property tax assessments of <1978}when levies on ordinary houses in nondescript neighborhoods often rose by several thousand dollars every two years or less. [were> . . . literally taxing many people on fixed incomes out of their homes (Elias, 2009). Proposition 13 “fever” soon raced across the nation with wildfire’s force, and along the way, ignited the interest of Mel Hancock, a Springfield, Mo. businessman and Republican Party promoter. Hancock, a one-time insurance salesman who later ran a security equipment firm, was no doubt attracted to the fame Howard Jarvis had achieved in California by collecting signatures and putting Proposition 13 on the ballot. Jarvis, a septuagenarian from Orange County, was catapulted into instant, national recognition as the leader of a successful “populist” campaign that reduced property taxes 57 percent (Smith, 1999). The populist label attracted Hancock, who in 1978 had aspirations of succeeding his mentor and friend, long-time member of Congress Gene Taylor (R-Mo.) Just as Jarvis did, Hancock designed an amendment to the Missouri Constitution that would reduce property taxes and state revenues. He and his committee collected signatures, and managed to get it on the ballot in November, 1980. Similar measures, near copies or merely bills that were inspired by California’s Proposition 13, were also put on the ballot that year and for several elections to come. Some of the measures failed, but the Hancock Amendment passed. Hancock’s aspirations for public office would have to wait. It took ten years for the security system salesman from the Show-Me State to win an election and follow his buddy Gene Taylor to the U.S. Congress; Nevertheless, Hancock managed to accomplish something with his tax bill that even Jarvis didn’t do: his name and the tax and expenditure limiting law (TEL) he championed became synonymous – known to one and all as the Hancock Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PinkTiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. To clarify
The Hancock Amendment is similar to Proposition 13 in California and the TABOR in Colorado.
When states become bankrupt because of this type of measure, it affects everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC