Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CONDI RICE POSTMORTEM (Washington Monthly)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 09:20 AM
Original message
CONDI RICE POSTMORTEM (Washington Monthly)
CONDI RICE POSTMORTEM....Shorter Condi Rice:

"By no means did he ask me to act on a plan....I don't remember the al Qaeda cells as being something that we were told we needed to do something about....The responsibility for the FBI to do what it was asked was the FBI's responsibility.....If there was any reason to believe that I needed to do something or that Andy Card needed to do something, I would have been expected to be asked to do it....There is no mention or recommendation of anything that needs to be done about them."

This is courtesy of Garance Franke-Ruta at Tapped, who nicely sums up the consensus about Rice's performance: she claimed that she took the threat of terrorism very seriously indeed, but to explain her inaction in the face of such a serious threat she was forced to paint a picture of herself as someone who just passively waited around for other people to make recommendations. As Fred Kaplan puts it in Slate:

Why did she need a recommendation to do something? Couldn't she make recommendations herself? Wasn't that her job? Given the huge spike of traffic about a possible attack (several officials have used the phrase "hair on fire" to describe the demeanor of those issuing the warnings), should she have been satisfied with the lack of any sign that the FBI wasn't tracking down the cells? Shouldn't she have asked for positive evidence that it was tracking them down?

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2004_04/003660.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. What had my head spinning,
now in print! Thanks Blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Before this testimony, i didn't realize that she couldn't act without
her subordinates telling her exactly what to do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Any link to total transcript of her testimony? I want to check my hearing.
I could have sworn I heard her say that the Chimp was 'wandering around the situation room, looking for something to do.'
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Now according to the Chimp himself, he couldn't remember BEING in the situation room (Stewart made hay with that one on the Daily Show: where the hell else should the imbecile be, at such a time???)
So now I think I hear Sleezza say that, anyone else catch that??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. just type these words into news.google
www.news.google.com

rice transcript commission
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I found it; it apparently was something she was paraphrasing from Clarke's
book, not her own description of Chimpy's behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. It all makes perfect sense now
The fake president has a fake National Security Advisor. 9-11 is what happens when a partisan hack is appointed to a position of grave responsibility.

One of the statements that had my bullshit meter off the scale was her claim under oath that they were too busy improving relations with other countries. :wtf: Oh yeah? What countries were those? The plurality of nations that signed the Kyoto protocols?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skip fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-10-04 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. But, boy, you're not going to believe this! Breaking: on Condi!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC