Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

After going 7 for 12 last year: My predictions for 2009.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Mugsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 09:14 AM
Original message
After going 7 for 12 last year: My predictions for 2009.
Happy New Year All!

It is time again for my annual Predictions for the coming year. After going 7 for 12 in 2008 (and arguably 9 for 12 with "partial credit"), maybe I know what I'm talking about.

via "Mugsy's Rap Sheet":


It may be one of the most self-indulgent things any writer does all year: making predictions based upon a possibly misplaced belief that they have an insight superior to those of mortal men. In the 1977 movie, “Oh, God!”, God himself said, “Sure I know the future! The moment it becomes the past.” Even God it appears can not foresee what the future holds, so what makes me think I can?
(...)

  1. Criticism of the GOP as becoming "the Party of racist" will grow in 2009 as Republicans... both elected and non... continue to make conspicuously racist comments about President Obama with increasing frequency. By years end, the GOP will hold "an emergency meeting" to discuss its "identity crisis", but being fundamentally clueless as to what constitutes acceptable behavior and what doesn't, even their "solutions" (talk of appointing more African-Americans like Michael Steele of Ohio to lead the GOP) based more upon skin color than their qualifications, will be criticized as "Conservative Affirmative Action". Talk of increased support for Republican Governor Bobby Jindal, a dark-skinned Conservative of Indian descent, will grow. Yes, the GOP will make racist appointments/endorsements to try and counter accusations of being "racist".


  2. President Obama will be criticized for not being "different enough" from George Bush despite signing the Kyoto Treaty, beefing up regulation of Wall Street and the banking industry, and actually removing most troops from Iraq.


  3. Osama bin Laden will NOT be caught by the end of 2009. Nor will he release another video. Questions of whether he is even still alive will grow to help facilitate the call for withdrawal from Afghanistan. (side note: questions as to whether OBL is even still alive emerged within days of the assassination of Pakistan's Benazir Bhutto late in 2007, when she seemed to let slip the fact one of her bodyguards may have already killed him.)


  4. Once U.S. troops start pulling out of Iraq, a surprising lack of disastrous consequences predicted by the Bushies means withdrawal at a pace faster than anyone predicted. With England expected to have no more than 400 troops in Iraq by June and a full withdrawal by years end, it will become harder and harder for Republicans to justify American troops remaining alone in Iraq in any great number for an additional year. The Iraqi government, which already wants a full withdrawal by mid-2010, will also start pushing for a late 2009 deadline.


  5. The number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan will outnumber the number of U.S. troops in Iraq by October, not so much because the number of troops in Iraq has declined as much as the number of troops in Afghanistan will grow.


  6. By years end, the number of U.S. troops in Iraq will still be just over 30,000. (I am torn on this prediction because if things go as I expect, I can also foresee ALL troops out of Iraq by years end as it becomes more and more obvious they can be withdrawn without grave consequences. But Republican obstructionism is likely to slow any withdrawal as they stir up "concern" over what "too quick" a withdrawal might have on the stability of the country. Addressing those concerns will result in a slower redeployment than is possible and part of why Obama will be accused of "not being different enough from Bush" <see #3>.)


  7. (...)


Read my full list of 15 predictions on "Mugsy's Rap Sheet"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. My prediction for 2009 is that the death of the UK's puppet monarch
will result in a military coup d'etat in the UK that will spread worldwide to the arrest of all her blood relatives in the US and elsewhere starting with connections of the Bush/Blair Iraq war dream ticket.

Five dollars on that one.

Oh, and expect a Chevron/ConocoPhilips merger later in the year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mugsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The Royals
I don't foresee the Royal Family going anywhere anytime soon.

(If there was ever a time to depose them, it was the '90's when just about every member became a punchline.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I see 95% of the so called House of Windsor behind bars when
Old Fatty Mountbatten finally pops her clogs.

And 2009 would be the ideal year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. "Old Fatty Mountbatten finally pops her clogs"
is there a class i can take so that i can learn how to say cool stuff like that?

seriously, i would pay greatly. i wallow in my mediocrity. amurikans are drab.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Never underestimate the art of 'murican deadpan.
The ultimate in verbal poker bluff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I am sure that even if she dies, there won't be a military coup.
This is 2009. Not 1649 or something. The royals are rich but not powerful in a political or military sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-03-09 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. This is a 100% puppet monarchy.
The collective DNA of 95% of the House of Windsor* has no more 'royal' blood than that of a dog on the streets of Kabul.

* Duke of Gloucester and family excepted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. I dunno where Michael Steele was born & raised, but he was Lite Goob to Bobby Hairspray of MD
Maybe he's living in Ohio now, but most of his political career was in Maryland.

helpfully,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-09 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. You're 0-for-1 already!
Michael Steel was Lt. Gov of Maryland.

Kenneth Blackwell is the asshole from Ohio.


NEXT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. Michael Steele is from Maryland, not Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC