Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

First a Tense Talk With Clinton, Then Richardson Backs Obama By ADAM NAGOURNEY and JEFF ZELENY

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:44 PM
Original message
First a Tense Talk With Clinton, Then Richardson Backs Obama By ADAM NAGOURNEY and JEFF ZELENY
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/22/us/politics/22richardson.html?_r=2&th&emc=th&oref=slogin&oref=slogin



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



PORTLAND, Ore. — “I talked to Senator Clinton last night,” Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico said on Friday, describing the tense telephone call in which he informed Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton that, despite two months of personal entreaties by her and her husband, he would be endorsing Senator Barack Obama for president.

“Let me tell you: we’ve had better conversations,” Mr. Richardson said.

The decision by Mr. Richardson, who ended his own presidential campaign on Jan. 10, to support Mr. Obama was a belt of bad news for Mrs. Clinton. It was a stinging rejection of her candidacy by a man who had served in two senior positions in President Bill Clinton’s administration, and who is one of the nation’s most prominent elected Hispanics. Mr. Richardson came back from vacation to announce his endorsement at a moment when Mrs. Clinton’s hopes of winning the Democratic nomination seem to be dimming.

But potentially more troublesome for Mrs. Clinton was what Mr. Richardson said in announcing his decision. He criticized the tenor of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign. He praised Mr. Obama for the speech he gave in response to the furor over racially incendiary remarks delivered by Mr. Obama’s former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr.

And he came close to doing what Mrs. Clinton’s advisers have increasingly feared some big-name Democrat would do as the battle for the nomination drags on: Urge Mrs. Clinton to step aside in the interest of party unity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nagourney is a propagator of Manhattan Cocktail Party gibberish
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Quotations Can't Be Faked in Journalism
Except for national security purposes, of course!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Ad Nags is your typical G-O-PRE$$TITUTE
I still remember when the Screw York Times actually fired somebody for making up things. Not anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Apparently Richardson has not taken note of the dirty tactics of the
Obama campaign. Talk about cheap shots, helping Mr. Clean reinforce his attempt to label Hillary's campaign. The MSM was doing nothing to vet Obama. She had to ask all the questions. The recent criticism of Obama's life choices had zip to do with her. Got to love the way Richardson tries to turn the Wright and Rezko bombshells into a bad bad Hillary story, reminiscent of Bush's dui story spun as a dirty Gore trick.

He will shortly disappear into the mists of history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It's not Richardson's fault that the Clintons had ties to Rezko AND Wright and didn't mention it.
Edited on Sat Mar-22-08 03:16 PM by rocknation
Getting caught out so easily made reflects badly on both their judgment and character. Indeed, it may have been the straw that broke Richardson's back.





:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Richardson is yet another one who will come crawling back to the Clintons one day...
...begging for forgiveness and asking for a crust of bread.

And knowing the Clintons, they'll probably forgive him, feed him, clothe him, and give him a job to help him get back on his feet.

Because, despite the diabolically inspired invective consistently aimed at the Clintons, despite all the lies told about them and all the slanders made up out of whole cloth, the truth is that nobody on this board can name a single specific incident wherein either Clinton acted toward anyone -- friend or enemy -- in anything other than a forgiving, Christian way.

Oh, yes -- they get ACCUSED of all sorts of things. But I'm talking about TRUTH. I'm talking about incidents people can PROVE.

And there aren't any.

Are there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I Sure Hope the Clintons Don't Sit On Their Hands Waiting For Repentance
It didn't happen last time, and it won't happen this time, either. Too many people have been pissed, off, blown off, and otherwise dissed by the Clintons these 20+ years. The damage isn't confined to Arkansas any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC