Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Washington Post: Forget Edwards -- The Dem Primary Is Nothing More Than A "Clinton-Obama Rivalry"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
antiimperialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 09:12 PM
Original message
Washington Post: Forget Edwards -- The Dem Primary Is Nothing More Than A "Clinton-Obama Rivalry"
Edited on Mon Nov-12-07 09:13 PM by antiimperialist
November 12, 2007
Talking Points Memo

As all you regulars know, one of this blog's running gripes is the refusal of your political media to acknowledge their own role in creating the narratives that help determine the outcome of campaigns.

Case in point -- this nugget from today's Washington Post report on the sparring between the candidates at the Jefferson-Jackson Dinner this weekend:

Edwards was the first of six presidential candidates to speak, and he tried to elbow his way into the Clinton-Obama rivalry with a populist call for Democrats to stand up against corporate interests and cleanse Washington of the corrupting influence of money and power.


According to WaPo, Edwards' speech was all about trying to "elbow his way" into the Hillary-Obama "rivalry." This makes it sound as if Campaign 2008 were less a political race than some kind of exclusive party that Hillary and Obama are throwing that Edwards is rudely trying to crash. But who decided that this race is little more than a Hillary-Obama rivalry in the first place? Why, WaPo did, of course!

After all, the same WaPo reporters who chose to describe Edwards' speech as an effort to "elbow" his way into the Hillary-Obama rivalry also chose to devote the first eight paragraphs of their piece only to what Hillary and Obama said. They chose to wait until the ninth graf to tell us what Edwards said. This despite the fact that the reporters also acknowledge that polls show that in Iowa the race remains "a competitive three-way contest."
...
story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fuck 'em
Let them explain this in after Edwards wins Iowa.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, yes. I'm SO inclined to let WaPo make my choices.
Yeah, the "elbow" phrasing is deliberate and NASTY. Stuff it in an orifice, WaPo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. WAPO has spoken. Your only choices are the empty suit or the empty pantsuit.
No REAL Democrats allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. IThe Media are no longer the 4th Estate, looking out for
Edited on Mon Nov-12-07 10:47 PM by OHdem10
Americans ---they are now as much a part of the elites
as K Street Lobbyists. The TV Media(most influential)
make the big salaries and their interests are no longer
the common man.

In monitoring Television, you would hardly know Edwards
is running for President. Populists are an abomination to
Corporatists.

They for the most part are corporately owned. Corporate Interests
are corporate interests.

INO this why some in our party are so "me too" trying to appease
the Corporations.

Listen and read, but through a prism of understanding where their
bread is buttered as they read you the news.

I am sure you are aware the WAPO is owned and run by a very historical
family who happen to be Republican. Editorials will have a GOP
frame, naturally. Rest of paper--they try to be in the center.

This explains Edwards treatment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. If a buck for every bogus story that pathetic paper published this last year
I'd have enough for a fine European vacation next spring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-13-07 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Not at the rate the dollar is dropping against the Euro.
You'd have to be paid by the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC