Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Al-Qaida nukes already in U.S.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Zorbuddha Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 10:56 AM
Original message
Al-Qaida nukes already in U.S.
Is this just RW fearmongering, or is there any truth to it?

----
Al-Qaida nukes already in U.S.
Terrorists, bombs smuggled across Mexico border by MS-13 gangsters

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WASHINGTON – As London recovers from the latest deadly al-Qaida attack that killed at least 50, top U.S. government officials are contemplating what they consider to be an inevitable and much bigger assault on America – one likely to kill millions, destroy the economy and fundamentally alter the course of history, reports Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin.

According to captured al-Qaida leaders and documents, the plan is called the "American Hiroshima" and involves the multiple detonation of nuclear weapons already smuggled into the U.S. over the Mexican border with the help of the MS-13 street gang and other organized crime groups.

Al-Qaida has obtained at least 40 nuclear weapons from the former Soviet Union – including suitcase nukes, nuclear mines, artillery shells and even some missile warheads. In addition, documents captured in Afghanistan show al-Qaida had plans to assemble its own nuclear weapons with fissile material it purchased on the black market.

<snip>

According to Williams' sources, thousands of al-Qaida sleeper agents have now been forward deployed into the U.S. to carry out their individual roles in the coming "American Hiroshima" plan.

Bin Laden's goal, according to the book, is to kill at least 4 million Americans, 2 million of whom must be children. Only then, bin Laden has said, would the crimes committed by America on the Arab and Muslim world be avenged.

<snip>

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45203

---

This seems abit over the top IMHO, as though intended to fuel the nuke'em before they nuke us meme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. MS-13 is helping Al-Qeda nuke American cities? That's a laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorbuddha Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Struck me as far-fetched, but I know little about the MS-13 street gang
Would you mind bringing me up to speed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. i don'rt know a lot, but they're a latino gang that has groups in every
city the country. i doubt they're interested in getting their familes nuked.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. I seriously dont know
what the hell your chimp created. This if it is a reality just one damn BIG NIGHTMARE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Examine the source; WND is serious RW kool-aid.
If this was from the BBC I'd give it credence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorbuddha Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Of course, but how do the references stand up to fact-checking?
How much is conjecture and propaganda?

That's the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. should've seen this coming
If true, this could explain some of why the Bush regime has gotten carte blanche to do anything they wanted.

On the other hand, do we believe a word these idiots say? If it were true the response should have been something else entirely, not invading Iraq and Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Really--and how about NOT outing a covert CIA WMD expert and her
entire covert eyes and ears network on WMDs around the world, for starters? For starters! Just DON'T DO exactly the wrong thing, and get our eyes and ears around the world killed, and disable and endanger our expert FOR STARTERS!

And then, how about NOT purging the CIA of people who are committed to providing the government with ACCURATE information? For seconders. And for thirders, how about NOT having a vice president who is war profiteering in WMDs? That would be a good third step. Fourthers, anyone?

-----
See

Plame...the tip of the iceberg... (Plame maybe investigating Cheney arms deals when they busted her CIA weapons op)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2178477#2180220
-----

Oh, I have a fourther! (You knew I would.) How about NOT letting your good buddies in Great Britain assassinate British chief weapons expert David Kelly, for fear of what truth he might next tell the public about WMDs?

Okay, a sixther: How about NOT committing mass murder, and NOT creating a chaos of looting, death squads, desperation, rebellion, arms dealing, torture, massive corporate theft, and open borders, in Iraq, so that a hotbed of terrorism will NOT be established there, and so that other Arab and Muslim countries will cooperate in non-proliferation, AND, how about NOT saber-rattling at Iran, Syria and North Korea, so that leaders there will NOT get frightened of invading US armies and bombings and will NOT seek nukes and other WMDs in defense?

Finally, how about time-traveling back a couple of decades and NOT arming and funding Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein in your stupid, venal, Rumsfeldian, geopolitical, war profiteering games?

That's for seventhers. Eighthers, anybody?

----------

The answer to the stink in Washington DC is restoring our right to vote, by throwing Bushite electronic voting machine companies--Diebold, ES&S and brethren--out of the election business NOW--or at the least achieving some measure of election transparency with paper ballot backups, no secret programming code and strict auditing. The only place where we can get that done is in state/local jurisdictions, where the authority over election systems still resides, and where ordinary people still have some say. See the DU Forum "2004 Election Results and Discussion" for information and action ideas:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=203http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=203


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorbuddha Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Eighther
Stand up to, and put down all, LIES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kitkat65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'd say look at the source
World Net Daily seems to be a very conservative website offering links to Anne Coulter and Scarborough books. It also seems to promote the Christian dominance agenda. They're most likely biased or trying to stir up already deeply-ingrained ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorbuddha Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I would tend to agree.
But there are a number of assertions that can be checked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorbuddha Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Are you suggesting ex FBI consultant Williams does not exist?
And did not write the book cited?

I'm a little confused. Of course, WND's slant is always ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. People that try to scare the shit out of you are not your friends.
This is guy is a loon out to make a buck on your gullibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorbuddha Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Gullibility isn't theissue. It is the merits or lack thereof, the claims.
There are people of official capacity cited here, their feet should be held to the fire lest this further the madness of using nukes to thwart nukes.

Big picture, folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. Gullibility is certainly an issue when evaluating credibility of claims.
This fellow is a lying sack of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorbuddha Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I'm not vouching for the writer. I'm saying the book he cites
can be fact checked. Aside from opinion.

Opinion is dogma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. So, you better get right on that. Check it all out. Give us details.
But seriously, it's easy enough to observe that al Qaeda, whatever you think it is, has NOT used any form of WMD. One could assume that is because they are too stupid to manage it, but in all others respects they have been kicking our ass, things are going very well from the al Qaeda point of view. So I think it's a policy decision. They stick with spectacular multiple attacks with conventional explosives. Why should they mess with a winning hand? WMD are messy, dangerous, hard to control, catastrophic public-relations-wise, etc. There is just no point in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorbuddha Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. cute
I meant in terms of context for discussion.

To cut the fearmongering from the real threat.

The body of your message is mostly assumption, but you pointed that out. I think you make a good overall point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. Media Matters has some things to say about WorldNetDaily.com
Edited on Tue Jul-12-05 11:48 AM by ailsagirl
Media Matters for America has repeatedly documented conservative misinformation being propagated by WorldNetDaily.com:

WND columnist and author Bob Kohn fabricated evidence that Senator John Kerry was having an affair with a New York Times reporter.

WorldNetDaily.com columnist and White House correspondent Les Kinsolving distorted a 1973 statement by Senator John McCain (R-AZ) to smear Kerry.

WorldNetDaily.com news reports have repeated discredited charges against Kerry's Vietnam war record; distorted a speech by progressive financier and philanthropist George Soros; and claimed that weapons of mass destruction were discovered in Iraq.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200409160002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorbuddha Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. If the supposed facts are bogus, they should be refuted.
That's the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. The sad thing is
there are those out there who will believe this crap.

Let's see -- what would a black market nuke go for. 10 million? 40 of them? 400,000,000 dollars? Ya think such a transaction would escape the notice of even our intelligence service? And they'd trust delivery to a street gang?

Great - engender fear of terrorists and latinos in the same breath.

One, or even two nukes might escape notice, but 'at least 40' is pure nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorbuddha Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Yes. That's the ticket!
This should be picked apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. I Seriously Doubt That A Latino Street Gang
and "other organized crime groups" are interested in nuking a number of cities. Kind of seems like it would be bad for business.

They really need to hire some better fiction writers. When their 'news' reports become this implausible, the propaganda aspect becomes comically apparent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorbuddha Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. It mostly refers claims by a former FBI consultant, not a WND reporter
snip

But the most disturbing news is that high level U.S. officials now believe at least some of those weapons have been smuggled into the U.S. for use in the near future in major cities as part of this "American Hiroshima" plan, according to an upcoming book, "The al-Qaida Connection: International Terrorism, Organized Crime and the Coming Apocalypse," by Paul L. Williams, a former FBI consultant.

snip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. "smuggled...over the Mexican border"? IMPOSSIBLE!
Edited on Tue Jul-12-05 12:51 PM by MercutioATC
We have a bunch of armed, not-too-bright civilian rednecks guarding that border...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorbuddha Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. And THEY ARE PISSED.
Boy, are they pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
21. I would be surprised if they did not
already have such weapons in the US. This has been a long standing plan. Luckily for Al Qaeda, bin Laden has friends in the Whitehouse to help them by being incompetent at protecting this country, but skilled at lying and taking advantage of their incompetence.

Why has bin Laden not been caught? One wonders if there is an "October Surprise" type operation in force so that while American soldiers chase bin Laden, getting wounded and killed, he is always one step ahead.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
26. Guess they'd use em as fast as they could get em, if they had em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
29. World Nut Daily??? Bwaaaaa!!!
This is a neocon wet dream. Why post such obvious trash?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
30. Locking
World Net Daily is not a valid news source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC