By ALAN GUEBERT, For The Globe Gazette
Presidential budget proposals usually are about two things, politics and mathematics. Both elements carry equal weight. <snip>
That simple point, however, has been lost on the Bush administration. Its broader 2006 budget proposals and narrower U.S. Department of Agriculture spending plans contain neither compelling politics nor convincing math.
Overall, the 2006 White House budget is a hall of cracked mirrors noted more for what it excludes — $80 billion for Iraq and Afghanistan, the 10-year, $1 trillion "transition cost" of its Social Security reform plan, $1.2 trillion in tax cuts — than what it includes, like slicing $5.7 billion out of USDA over the next decade. <snip>
In rounds on Capitol Hill the day after the budget proposal was released, adds this insider, "Every staff member we met, Republican and Democrat alike, was really (angry). Asking for budget cuts is one thing, we heard over and over, but the policy changes here are just weird." <snip>
http://www.globegazette.com/articles/2005/02/13/business/doc420ec18632374543081931.txt