NYT: Vote Fraud Theories, Spread by Blogs, Are Quickly Buried

[NVMojo]

...and now the New York Times spreads fraud theories of another kind.


NYT: The e-mail messages and Web postings had all the twitchy cloak-and-dagger thrust of a Hollywood blockbuster. "Evidence mounts that the vote may have been hacked," trumpeted a headline on the Web site CommonDreams.org. "Fraud took place in the 2004 election through electronic voting machines," declared BlackBoxVoting.org.

In the space of seven days, an online market of dark ideas surrounding last week's presidential election took root and multiplied.

But while the widely read universe of Web logs was often blamed for the swift propagation of faulty analyses, the blogosphere, as it has come to be known, spread the rumors so fast that experts were soon able to debunk them, rather than allowing them to linger and feed conspiracy theories. Within days of the first rumors of a stolen election, in fact, the most popular theories were being proved wrong - though many were still reluctant to let them go.

snip...

"I'd give my right arm for Internet rumors of a stolen election to be true," said David Wade, a spokesman for the Kerry campaign, "but blogging it doesn't make it so. We can change the future; we can't rewrite the past."

more...http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/12/politics/12theory.html?oref=login&th

more...

[TaleWgnDg]

1. duplicate:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x47124