Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Defends Iraq Invasion Despite Report -13 minutes ago

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:07 PM
Original message
Bush Defends Iraq Invasion Despite Report -13 minutes ago
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=1&u=/ap/20041007/ap_on_re_mi_ea/us_iraq_weapons

WASHINGTON - Faced with a harshly critical new report, President Bush (news - web sites) conceded Thursday that Iraq (news - web sites) did not have the stockpiles of banned weapons he had warned of before the invasion last year, but insisted that "we were right to take action" against Saddam Hussein (news - web sites).


"America is safer today with Saddam Hussein in prison," Bush said in a surprise statement to reporters as he prepared to fly to Wisconsin.


"Much of the accumulated body of our intelligence was wrong and we must find out why," Bush said.


"The Duelfer report showed that Saddam was systematically gaming the system, using the U.N. oil for food program to try to influence countries and companies in an effort to undermine sanctions," Bush said. "He was doing so with the intent of restarting his weapons program once the world looked away."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. out of touch
the man (and i use that term very, very LooseLy) is Living in his own fantasy worLd. he's pLaying the fiddLe whiLe his advisors assure him that rome is not on fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. They are sticking with the "ends justify the means" rhetoric
Well W the end is upon us and the end result is YOU LIED. Don't blame it on the CIA or "intelligence" your guys created their own intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. the buck stops at john kerry
he was the one who created this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kierkegaard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. The ends keep getting shorter and shorter though.
No ties to al Quieda: ok, he had nuke capability!

Nope, no nukes: ok, he had weapons of mass destruction!

Nope, no WMDs: ok, he was trying to get them!

Nope, didn't have the funds: well, damn it, he was thinking about it!

Yawn, did you say something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Streetdoc270 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. Of all people O'Riely nailed it on TDS
Talking about Bush and how he is out of touch with reality because of the protective 'bubble' that he is in for security. He also said that Bush did not care about outsourcing because he was not affected by it. I was shocked by his replies and so was John...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. He has to defend it. He's got nothing without it.
It's why Cheney lied through his teeth on Wed, and it's why they'll both continue to lie right up to Nov 2. The second they tell the truth, they're finished, and they know it.

Hopefully, they're finished regardless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I agree
It is too late for "I'm sorry"s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. They should be under investigation regardless and let the judges
determine the lies from the truth. We all knew long ago Saddam was a diversion for control of the oil. The Saudi's and Bangdar Bush are in cohorts with Bush/Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. so we killed thousands of innocent civillians because of
gaming the system?

This entire maladmin should be up on war crimes charges.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Apprently several sides were "gaming the system"
Huh George?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's no wonder why he doesn't want the US to be in the world court. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. No, we would be safer if Osma were in Saddam's place and then
we could have went after Saddam once we had the REAL threat in prison! Bush is STILL getting it WRONG...he just doesn't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueNomad Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nero fiddles
as Rome burns..

How is this approach helpful to him. It just isn't. Pathetic propped up little buffoon of a puppet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. What better alternative does he have?
If this were Texas Holdem, Bush's best hand would be, say, something even less than a pair of twos. Maybe a "six-high", or some such.

But he's also "all-in". Everything is on the line for him, and he's got no hand to play.

So, all he can do is bluff, and hope it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueNomad Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I get that...
...you're right...but geez, after a while he sounds like a ridiculous moronic automaton... His handlers are not helping him...I think he's killing himself further....It's his hand for sure but shit stop showing it to me every 3 hours cause it sucks... I know what you got and I ain't buying and frankly all the undecideds I know have turned away from watching this fool repeat the same three lines in the midst of an avalanche of opposing facts and evidence......

the fantasy land stuff looks truer every time he speaks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Sooner or later Kerry will challenge him to look into the camera...
...intimidate him into speaking directly to the sons, daughters, husbands, wives, mothers, fathers, brothers & sisters of the 1000+ dead and God-Knows-How-Many-Wounded, and say:

"What happened to your loved ones? Your loss? IT WAS WORTH IT."

THAT, my friends, is the bullet Mr. Bush is dodging. He talks about the world being a safer place with Saddam behind bars. Tell some fucking little kid in the Midwest that's gonna grow up without one or more parents that it was "worth it" and then you can REALLY prove you have balls (or at best that you're stone cold crazy).

If Kerry can get him in the crosshairs with that one...call him out, frigging THROW DOWN, we are good to go. Kerry is the only man in the world who can decide if he's gonna take the gloves off and whip Juniors little prep school cheeks with 'em.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. We Must find out why? Duh.
We KNOW why dumass - its because you set up your own intelligence agency - you know - the Office of Special Plans???? And then arm-twisted to get them to say what you wanted to hear. There is NO mystery here.

You started an illegal war - have some respect for yourself and resign immediately! Before you're fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. "Head, meet ass. Ass, head."
"This looks like the beginning of a beatiful friendship!"



Bush 2004: Cause the world looks great when you keep swallowing the same shit over, and over, and over, and over...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. Was it Molly who said "It's one thing to have your head up your ass, but
quite another to enjoy the view"....?
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Bush is going to stick to his smoking gun, isn't he?
He's betting on the prize heavily, even he's got a wrong horse!

He knew that if he said "I was wrong about Iraq" then he'd be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
17. ONCE THE WORLD LOOKED AWAY--not a gathering threat until then
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
20. The guy's got nothing. He is left to only tote the line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. So now wanting sanctions lifted is equivalent to an act of war?
"The vice president said he found other parts of the report "more intriguing," including the finding that Saddam's main goal was the removal of international sanctions."

It kind of makes sense, since Saddam seems to have wanted to improve the economic lot of his countrymen by getting sanctions lifted. To Bush and Cheney, improving the economic lot of your fellow citizens is criminal (unless they are rich).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. Welcome to Bizarro world. Cheney
claims that the report made by 1200 people in an 18 month search vindicates the Iraqi invasion when it says the weapons all went away after '92 and Saddam's main concern was getting the sanctions lifted.


These people are either fucking nuts or believe that the U.S. population is stupider than the average freeper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBigBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
23. Kerry can't use this
until he successfully (i.e., for the fence sitters, not us) divorces his Senate vote for authority from Bush's war.

Until he does that, he's wiping egg off his face as well. Sorry, but it's true.

(*Bear climbs into his asbestos suit)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gavodotcom Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. No, he can, and I'm not trying to be a dick.
Edited on Fri Oct-08-04 01:24 AM by gavodotcom
Kerry, and everyone who uses Kerry's talking points on TV to defend him against criticisms such as this, has been as yet unable to condense the:

"I gave the President the authority to go to war because I felt that it was important to present a united front to Saddam so that Saddam would actually open up his WMD programs to the world. This was actually what Bush characterized the Congressional resolution as when it was presented to the Senate; a united front to get Saddam to back down--that he would face military action if he did not. But when I voted for the resolution, I said that this resolution was to be used to allow the weapons inspectors time to do their work, and build up an international coalition. Bush did not use my vote for this means, instead he broke off diplomacy and started the war,"

into a well-rehearsed sound byte.

And there's probably a very good tactical reason he hasn't' done this in the year and a half after he voted--it would be taken out of context. His sound byte could very easily be truncated, and he doesn't need another "i voted for it before i voted against it" flip-flopping charge.

If the fence-sitters don't get the Kerry explanation, then there's not a lot you can do.

Now, as for why Kerry CAN easily go after this.

All Kerry has to do is explain that he DOESN'T get the same intelligence reports that Bush does. The head of the CIA and FBI do NOT report to a Massachusetts senator, they serve the President of the United States. The PRESIDENT is the gate-keeper of intelligence information. What HE deems credible and feels he has the ability to share with Congress & the American people comes from HIS DECISION.

I have absolutely no idea why the Kerry camp doesn't explain this. It's a huge tactical mistake, in my opinion, and although I've thought about it a lot--really I have--I have no good answer for why Kerry hasn't already done this.

If he has, I've missed it, and I'd appreciate a link to his remarks.

EDIT:grammar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBigBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I agree completely

All Kerry has to do is explain that he DOESN'T get the same intelligence reports that Bush does. The head of the CIA and FBI do NOT report to a Massachusetts senator, they serve the President of the United States.


Bingo, absolutely correct.

But, despite the fact that the OSP conditioned, tweaked and distorted WMD intelligence will be neutralized by the Commission report that said otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
27. Hellaburnin was systematically gaming the system as well. Maybe
we should look more closely at who and how else those sanctions were being undermined?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maeve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
28. Americans are safer...except for the 1068 killed over there
And the 7531 wounded (that the DOD admits to)...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
29. We'd be safer if Bush was in prison with him. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
30. "America is safer today with Saddam Hussein in prison,"
Saddam was never a threat to America, you dumb ass! Kerry needs to say this to his face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clover Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
32. clincher tonight
Harvey Wasserman
Kerry's four magic words tonight to win it all: "George Bush must resign"
October 8, 2004
John Kerry can win the debate and the election tonight by opening with the four most obvious words in global politics today: "George Bush must resign."
The confirmations that Bush lied about Saddam's non-existent ties to Al Quida, 9/11 and Weapons of Mass Destruction mean one vital thing above all: this administration can no longer conduct a credible foreign policy. Not in the next four years, four months or four days.
It's not about whether the Iraqi invasion was "worth it." Or whether the world is safer without Saddam Hussein.
It's about the inevitable next crisis. About the fact that this administration has taken the world to war on false pretenses.
And that it will never be believed again: It lied to the American people. It lied to Congress. It lied to the global community.
Next time, Bush will not be believed by any of them, no matter what the truth or urgency of the situation. The public, the Congress, the UN have all been burned, and "won't be fooled again."
So in all practical terms, Bush has nullified his ability to act on the world stage.
Therefore, he cannot conduct a credible foreign policy. He cannot protect America. He must resign.
And Kerry needs to open with just that. The debate is officially about domestic policy. But we know Bush will pepper his every blunt, narrowly structured answer with fear mongering about "global terrorists" (as if he didn't allow them to succeed on September 11, 2001).
Kerry can respond to the expected opening question on domestic policy by vowing to answer it after he takes just 60 seconds to call for Bush's resignation due to these new confirmations of the administration's dishonesty, which mean that Bush can no longer conduct a credible foreign policy.
Bush is not likely to recover.
He could respond, bluntly, that, no, it's Kerry who should resign as a candidate.
But the global headline will still be Kerry's call for Bush to go. And that Bush's monosyllabic stammerings were clearly the response of an incompetent. Of someone incapable of thinking on his feet. Of someone who can't conduct a credible foreign policy, let alone explain four years of unprecedented job loss, economic chaos and eco-catastrophe.
So, Mr. President-to-be, here's what we want to hear, right at the top of the hour: "George Bush should resign."
Four words heard round the world. Four words to take John Kerry to the Oval Office. Four words to rid our nation of a failed president whose credibility gap has rendered him impotent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC