Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cadence says jobs to move overseas

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 06:32 AM
Original message
Cadence says jobs to move overseas
Cadence says jobs to move overseas
Company looking to cut expenses

John Shinal, Chronicle Staff Writer Monday, August 25, 2003

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Cadence Design Systems Inc., the San Jose maker of software used to design computer chips, plans to move more of its Silicon Valley jobs to China and India as it cuts costs amid stiff competition and an industry downturn, chief executive Ray Bingham said Friday.

<SNIP>

"What you'll see from us is a continuing theme, moving more jobs to a cost- effective place," Bingham said. During a July 15 conference call, Cadence officials said the company would cut 500 jobs, or 10 percent of its workforce.

Cadence is locked in fierce competition with Synopsys Inc. of Mountain View in the $4 billion industry for software used by companies like Intel and IBM to help build new chips. Although semiconductor sales are expected to rebound this year after a two-year slump, chipmakers are cutting the amount they spend on such software to boost profits.

Analysts expect sales of these products, known as electronic design automation, or EDA, software, to drop this year for the first time in at least a decade. Cadence's 2003 revenue is expected to fall to $1.1 billion from $1.4 billion last year.

<SNIP>

"In India and China, we can get three to five equivalent engineers for what we pay one here," Bingham said.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/08/25/BU294040.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. What gets me about this economy
I have this feeling that all these "new jobs" that whistleass says will be found because of the tax cuts will never be realized. I'm convinced companies are learning to make do with less and why should they hire people when they've shown that the job can be done without them, let alone shipping jobs overseas. (Apologies for the run-on sentence.)

It's all a sham. Smoke and mirrors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Has any candidate, Republican or Democrat, proposed a solution?
What can you do about jobs leaving the country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Howard Dean has proposed that...
Howard Dean has proposed that (and I'm paraphrasing) we require
overseas countries to abide by the same rules and regulations that
we impose here in the United States, and if they don't, we apply
tarriffs to, in effect, add equivalent cost to the products.

I don't know how this applies to "Intellectual Property" such as
software developed by high-tech companies.

But it's clear we either: 1) Find a way to mitigate American
job losses caused by overseas out-sourcing, or 2) Learn to live
in a third-world economy. I am certain that my job won't exist
in two to five years; I've been told as much by my managers.
They are happy to have me oversee our Indian subcontractors
though.

Atlant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Making sure companies aren't abusive makes sense
Making sure that products imported into America are not created by child labor or slave labor is a great idea.

However, even if you require the companies in India and Pakistan to pay their people fair wages and treat them well, they can still produce goods and services at an exponentially lower wage than those in America.

There could be people working in India for one third of what an equivalent American worker would be making doing the same work, but the Indian worker would actually be making more money relative to his cost of living.

Even if there was an international minimum wage, that wage would have to be adjusted for each country. Once you adjust it to the cost of living in some countries, American labor becomes too expensive for many companies to remain competetive.

There have been some good discussions about this issue on DU, and I have yet to see a real solution. It almost seems unsolvable without taking drastic action that would start a trade war, which would itself cause problems for U.S. workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cprise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Here is a reference-
"They have the right to have a middle class same as everyone else."
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/washpost/20030825/pl_washpost/a40299_2003aug24
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Look at Howard Deans website
go to his blog for america. He is proposing things like technical jobs for computer types. Things like distance education, online classes etc.. tele-medicine. He is also proposing 20% renewable energy like wind and solar power to decrease polution and to hire people to maintain the things. All the engineers and everybody tht it takes to do the up keep on such a program. Cleaner air and higher employment rates. It will also reduce the amount of things like asthma exacerbation cases. Go to his blog and he has all of his policys, statements and his records from VT Gov days there in PDF format.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
premjan Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. jobs leaving country
other than information technology jobs, a certain amount of protectionism (of manufacturing and so on) is probably in order. It will happen eventually as the backlash against export of jobs begins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. It will happen when Bush is out of office
I picked up an article in here a few weeks ago about outsourcing jobs to India. Bush going against states protest promised India he would still send them jobs. About a week later the jobs in NC were lost, what was that 16,000 jobs or was it 1,600 jobs from the factory sectory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
duid12 Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. yea right
>> It will happen when Bush is out of office

Dream on. This happended before Bush, and will continue to happen after Bush. Bush hasn't done anything to solve the problem, but he certainly didn't cause it. The massive export of jobs really got ramped up (at least in the IT field) under the 8 years of Clinton.

Don't assume all these problems will go away just because a democrat takes over. All that gets us in a democrat in the white house with the same problems. If you worry about this problem, ask the candidates what SPECIFICALLY they intend to do about it...and vote accordingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Regardless of the Dem view, Bush still is outsourcing
Edited on Mon Aug-25-03 08:22 AM by jamesinca
That does not help. Have you not checked the Dean Web site for his ideas on this. I would hope you have since you have the Dean avatar image. By the way, Dean does have a plan to keep jobs here in the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Bush wants to outsource...
...the fuckin' military for godsake.

Un-fuckin'-believable.

If military folks still vote Repug after
hearing that, and after getting hung out
to dry (in 120 degree heat in Iraq w little
water or protection), then they're hopelessly
clueless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Agreed
The Dems are part of this problem.
And the Dems aren't part of the solution.

Tho' at least they don't intentionally
sabatoge the economy and loot the treasury
in conjunction with sending jobs overseas
and boosting NAFTA.

I don't know if Clinton & Gore supported
NAFTA because they had to with a Repug congress,
or because they simply wanted to and are in
the pocket of big business.
I suppose I'll always wonder...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Correction, Myra: The DLC Dems, **Not** Dems in general (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. This is also what happened in the 80s when Raygun
Edited on Mon Aug-25-03 09:39 AM by Mari333
did what Bush did....tax breaks for the most wealthy, and the lies, and the corporations took the extra cash and took jobs out of the country...same old GOP shit..


and the US public bought these lies again????? geesh.

edit to add : NAFTA sucks, and any Dem or Repug who supports it is sending those jobs overseas also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Howard Dean voted for NAFTA, right?
I'm not trying to start a fight; I'm trying
to establish a fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. When was Howard Dean a Congresscritter?
Edited on Mon Aug-25-03 02:56 PM by Atlant
http://www.deanforamerica.com/site/PageServer?pagename=about_biography

He served in the Vermont House from 1982 to
1986; was elected lieutenant governor in 1986,
and became governor in 1991 with the death of
then-Governor Richard Snelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-25-03 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Since Dean Wasn't in Congress
He had no opportunity to vote on the NAFTA bill. Were you referring to something that happened to VT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC