spelling out some of the concerns the other countries have. They are not simple nitpicky ones, they are substantial changes that ask some very good questions, imo.
U.S. Faces U.N. Doubts on Military Control in Iraq
UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The United States faced misgivings from other U.N. Security Council members on Tuesday over the powers and length of stay of a U.S.-led force when authority is handed over to an Iraqi interim government on June 30.
snip
Another problem is whether Iraqi troops could refuse combat orders from a U.S.-led military. But U.S. officials said this would be incorporated into a letter, attached to the resolution, from the new Iraqi leaders and the U.S. command.
Russia had wanted a two-step resolution, one to endorse the interim government and another to get its input on all other issues, but envoys said there was not time.
Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told the Interfax agency that Moscow decided on the draft after an Iraqi government was formed "to judge whether the new government can be credible first and foremost in the eyes of Iraqis themselves." (Additional reporting by Jon Boyle in Paris,)
more
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/iraq_un_reaction_dc(I found the last two paragraphs very interesting, a two-step resolution, it shows that there is NO trust in the US doing what they say they will do within the existing resolution, imo.)