Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mass. Senate Votes to Repeal Marriage Law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 07:16 PM
Original message
Mass. Senate Votes to Repeal Marriage Law

Wednesday May 19, 2004 8:31 PM
The Democrat-controlled state Senate voted overwhelmingly Wednesday to repeal the 1913 law that Republican Gov. Mitt Romney is using to bar out-of-state gay couples from marrying in Massachusetts.
The repeal was approved 28-3 as part of the Senate version of the state budget. For the law to be wiped from the books, the repeal would have to get through the far more conservative House and then survive a certain veto by Romney.
The 81-year-old law bars nonresidents from marrying in Massachusetts if the union would not be legal in their home state. Because no other state allows gay marriage, Romney has argued that out-of-state couples are prohibited from marrying here.
A day after gay marriage became legal in Massachusetts on Monday, Romney requested copies of all marriage applications filled out by gay couples in Provincetown, Somerville, Springfield and Worcester - four municipalities that openly defied Romney's order not to marry nonresident gay couples.
<more>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-4109327,00.html

In yer face, Guv'ner!:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Imalittleteapot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hooray for Mass! I long to live in that state --
as Texas regresses. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DieboldMustDie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. In 1913 a "union [that] would not be legal in their home state"
Edited on Wed May-19-04 08:07 PM by JavaJive
would primarily have been referring to anti-miscegenation laws. A law with that ugly a history should have been repealed years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-04 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Duplicate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC