Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate passes extension of Patriot Act provisions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 08:38 PM
Original message
Senate passes extension of Patriot Act provisions
Source: Los Angeles Times

The Senate late Tuesday passed a three-month extension of provisions of the USA Patriot Act as Congress works to avoid a lapse of elements of the terrorist surveillance program that expire at the end of the month.

Senate Democrats are hoping to avoid interjecting the national security issue into the 2012 presidential campaign by sending their bill to the Republican-led House, which earlier this week overcame opposition from conservative lawmakers to pass an extension through Dec. 8.

The Senate voted 86-12 to extend three expiring provisions of the act that became law after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Two Republicans, "tea-party"-backed Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), joined Democrats in voting against the bill.

Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-0215-patriot-act-senate-20110215,0,4310410.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. congratulations, we are being Mubaraked ..... again nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. one step closer to a complete fascist state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharksBreath Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. How much closer can we get. We are already there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. I knew Mike Lee would vote against it
Hell, at least he's consistent. Probably the most intelligent right-winger I have ever met.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeoConsSuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Call it what it is:
it is not a terrorist surveillance program. It is an American citizen surveillance program.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. ^^ This.
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Roll Call
Roll Call

YEAs ---86
Akaka (D-HI)
Alexander (R-TN)
Ayotte (R-NH)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Bennet (D-CO)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Blunt (R-MO)
Boozman (R-AR)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (R-MA)
Burr (R-NC)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coats (R-IN)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Conrad (D-ND)
Coons (D-DE)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Durbin (D-IL)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Hagan (D-NC)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hoeven (R-ND)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Inouye (D-HI)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Johnson (D-SD)
Johnson (R-WI)
Kirk (R-IL)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Kohl (D-WI)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (ID-CT)
Lugar (R-IN)
Manchin (D-WV)
McCain (R-AZ)
McCaskill (D-MO)
McConnell (R-KY)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Moran (R-KS)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Portman (R-OH)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Rubio (R-FL)
Schumer (D-NY)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Shelby (R-AL)
Snowe (R-ME)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Thune (R-SD)
Toomey (R-PA)
Udall (D-CO)
Vitter (R-LA)
Warner (D-VA)
Webb (D-VA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wicker (R-MS)
Wyden (D-OR)

NAYs ---12
Baucus (D-MT)
Begich (D-AK)
Brown (D-OH)
Harkin (D-IA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Lee (R-UT)
Merkley (D-OR)
Murray (D-WA)
Paul (R-KY)
Sanders (I-VT)
Tester (D-MT)
Udall (D-NM)

Not Voting - 2
Kerry (D-MA)
Pryor (D-AR)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EvilMonsanto Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. ??
Do you have a Rep. vs. Dem number on yay or nay?

I don't feel like running through your list manually like that, anyone already know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. against 2 repub, 10 dems, 2 dems abstain
everybody else for.
what's that leave 44 R and 42 D?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marasinghe Donating Member (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. didn't take gillibrand long to sign on to the company line.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Look at all those D's that voted yes.... gutless wonders....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. oh, that list is sickening: boxer, leahy, franken, whitehouse.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. They see We, the People as the enemy
it's quite clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DissedByBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Uh, we still control the Senate, right?
WTF?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IamK Donating Member (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. depends on who "we" is I guess....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. crap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Capitalocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
19. AVOID interjecting it into the 2012 campaign?
I say make it an issue! If you ever plan on changing it, that is, which apparently they don't...

Trying to avoid making it an issue? That's their excuse for voting for fascism? And we're supposed to just take it and say well, that's how you play three-dimensional chess! Bollocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
21. kick (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
22. Not gonna be popular, but this is why the 17th Amendment was the dumbest thing we ever did
Edited on Wed Feb-16-11 02:02 AM by Ter
The Senate is full of Dinos and Rinos, all gutless moderates who refuse to take a stand on controversial issues. It's very rare that true ideologues of either side ever get elected to the Senate. Not so in the House. 10 Democrats voting no while the majority voted no in the House? 2 true Tea Baggers, yet 27 in the House? Disgusting, and we have nothing to blame except 1913.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 04:08 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. "17th Amendment was the dumbest thing we ever did...2 true Tea Baggers"
You're a fan of regression?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC