Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jerry Brown warns educators to brace for more cuts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 12:44 AM
Original message
Jerry Brown warns educators to brace for more cuts
Source: San Francisco Chronicle

Gov.-elect Jerry Brown said Tuesday that public schools in California should brace for more budget cuts when he presents his spending proposal in the next few weeks to solve the state's $25.4 billion budget deficit.

The Democrat called education and public safety the pillars of a civilized society but warned that the magnitude of the deficit problem facing California is "unprecedented in my lifetime" and that the state must prepare for drastic changes.

"I can't promise there won't be more cuts, because there will be," he told a gathering of school administrators, teachers union representatives and other public education officials from across the state during a special budget forum in Los Angeles.

Brown implored those at the forum, which focused on education spending, to "please sit down" when they see his budget proposal on Jan. 10. "If you're in your car, fasten your seat belt. It's going to be a rough ride, but we'll get through it," he said.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/12/14/BAK91GQJRV.DTL&tsp=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruperto31 Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. California has a very low top bracket--$48K.
Everyone above that pays about 10%. That could be changed. Hawaii's top bracket, for example, is $200k. Why not introduce higher brackets for higher earners?

No, wait. I forgot. This is America. You can't do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm an unemployed teacher and grateful that Jerry Brown
is in the state house. He'll do what has to be done but he won't screw the schools over with the excuse that we have a deficit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. I hope you're right. I hope he has not changed over time.
I'm sorry you're unemployed--and not only on your behalf, but on behalf of those whom you'd be teaching if you were employed

A real loss to them, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. He and the circumstances have dramatically changed
It is bitter pill time in California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creative Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Indeed, their bill came due first.
Soon enough, it will come due for many other states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruperto31 Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. He always was a pinch-penny.
That was his pitch when he served as Gov the first time: liberal on social issues, tightwad on fiscal issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is not a decision with which I agree...
Raise Taxes.
I'm willing to pay more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. You'll get your chance for more taxes
Brown has promised to put tax hikes necessary to restore cuts before the voters as initiatives.

However, before that he will propose drastic cuts, as this article implies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. No, I won't pay more...
A majority of Californians who vote on tax initiatives are something for nothing assholes that don't care.

We elected a government to fix the problems, not whine that the public doesn't want them to do something.

I think I will by big bohunkin set of Truck Nuts and send them to Brown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. (huge audible GROAN)
No, no no, not more initiatives. Steroid boy already tried that. - Hello, just 6 weeks ago the voters stupidly rejected Prop 24.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PuffedMica Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 05:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Jerry Brown should legalize marijuana then raise taxes on pot
There are big bucks just waiting to be made with legal marijuana sales.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. He came out against Prop. 19.
He is literally a child of the Democratic PARTY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. This is not a quick solution. It would take a couple of years to implement...
the capitalist system to make money off luxury taxes on pot, while sending local entrepreneurs to jail so R.J. Reynolds and other such luminaries could gain control of the pipeline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Requires a 2/3 vote from either the people or the legislature.
There's no way a proposal like that will survive the ballot box. I know that Brown will be proposing new taxes in an upcoming election, but the chances of them passing are extremely small.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Then it may be time for Brown to call a California Constitutional Convention...
I'm tired of a Republican minority running the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Which still may not fix things.
California voters have consistently voted against anything that promises "tax increases". Even if you call a constitutional convention, the new Constitution must still be placed before the voters for final approval. A constitutional convention that didn't include the verbiage of Prop 13 or which contained no limits on taxation would come under massive attack by the right (and sadly, many on the left) as a "backdoor way to increase your taxes". Given the incredible consistency that Californian's have shown in shooting down tax increases, I have a hard time imagining that a convention could offer Californian's enough benefit to get them to override that knee-jerk "no taxes" impulse.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I long ago joined the pessimists on this issue. Californian's want government services, but many of our residents suffer from a serious mental disconnect when it comes to paying for them. Hell, we ousted a governor because he increased our CAR TAXES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I agree with you the majority of Californians are Cheap assed ...
something for nothingists when it comes to taxes.

I don't have to like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Actually Davis was blamed for legislation
pushed by wilson. The auto registration increase was built into the bill. When state revenues fell below a certain percentage the increase kicked in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creative Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. Actually, you can pay more. The state will accept your check.
However, Mr. Brown has promised not to raise taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. He's going to make drastic cuts and then ask the voters to approve new taxes
Edited on Wed Dec-15-10 02:20 AM by andym
to restore some of the services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. That is one of several strategies being discussed
Dems in the legislature rejoiced when he won, but without a repuke in the state house to blame, the legislature and the governor are going to be fully accountable for the cuts and the people may well decline to raise taxes.

The poison pill approach may not be enough to get voters to agree and I expect to see him push for the end of state defined benefit pensions as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleiri Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. Why not cut out the unnecessary testing
that's done in schools?
Not paying testing companies should save a bit of money.

While we're at it, why not tell charters that their Billionaire Benefactors have to fund them completely, instead of public money.

Money should be going to hire more teachers, so students can have smaller classes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. Will Brown propose repealing Proposition 13, the property tax giveaway to corporations passed in '78
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Third rail of California politics to oppose Prop 13
Edited on Wed Dec-15-10 04:08 AM by andym
It's still very popular. It's very hard to raise taxes here due to 2/3 rule. Even in the last election, Proposition 26 passed which makes state fee increases subject to the 2/3 legislative majority vote. Almost all property owners love Prop 13 too.

But California would greatly benefit from its modification or repeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. He doesn't have to oppose it. It could be a ballot question, or he could support it, but say
temporary suspension is necessary, given the ditch into which Republions drove the federal and state economy.

Letting the people decide in light of an emergency situation is not going to get him recalled in his first six months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. Commercial property needs to be excluded from 13.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Prop 13 is not the real issue in CA
Look up the Gann Initiative voted in by 75% of the voters a year later.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xolodno Donating Member (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
27. Some info in PDF format...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
28. Bait & Switch - Mission Accomplished!
Enjoy your austerity, California.

State Treasurer Bill Lockyer:
"So far, I've heard good ideas about how to spend more money. Great. It ain't there. It's time to make cuts, I believe deep cuts. I'd do the 25% across the board and just say those who wanted less government, you're going to get your wish."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creative Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. 25% seems a bit drastic. I thought the deficit was only $28 billion.
That would equate to about a 6% cut across the board.

Seems doable...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
31. "If you're in your car, fasten your seat belt."
And if you're on transit, like me?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC