Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Renews Sanctions on Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Nambe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 05:53 PM
Original message
Bush Renews Sanctions on Iraq
U.S. Department of State's Bureau of International Information


Certifies to Congress That Iraq Is a Continuing Threat

President Bush has formally renewed the U.S. sanctions against Iraq, citing continued instability in the country, as well as the need to "ensure the establishment of a process leading to representative Iraqi self-rule."

To extend the sanctions, the president certified to Congress that Iraq continues to pose a threat to the United States. Former President George Bush first imposed sanctions on Iraq on August 2, 1990.

Following is the text of the certification notice: ---


Very Good Voter’s Guide
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
StandWatie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. wtf?
I don't get it :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You mean, we're not in charge?
Jeez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
62. Those stubborn Iraqis. You try bombing, blasting, bayoneting...
...and STILL, you've got ring around the collar.

Poor Iraq! After the starvation, the bombing, the lack of medicine, the occupation and a thousand daily insults, will US depravity there ever end?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. this was about democracy they claim turns out its not so and you know what
I have known that since I first saw Bush make the case for war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hmmmmm
Somehow this doesn't make sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
30. The people in charge have not proved that Iraq does not have WMD yet
so the sanctions have to continue. It's consistent anyway... The burden of proof that Doubledip and Rumdum put on Saddam is now on thier shoulders - and they aren't succeed at proving that there are no WMD (or that there are) in Iraq either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wonder when this will hit the headlines
Will it? I wonder...I'd say it's a fairly big announcement..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. OMFG
Here's the text:

CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO IRAQ

On August 2, 1990, by Executive Order 12722, President Bush declared a national emergency with respect to Iraq pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the actions and policies of the Government of Iraq -- the Saddam Hussein regime. By Executive Orders 12722 of August 2, 1990, and 12724 of August 9, 1990, the President imposed trade sanctions on Iraq and blocked Iraqi government assets. Additional measures were taken with respect to this national emergency by Executive Order 13290 of March 20, 2003. Because of the continued instability in Iraq, the United States and Coalition partners' role as the temporary authority in Iraq, and the need to ensure the establishment of a process leading to representative Iraqi self-rule, the national emergency declared on August 2, 1990, and the measures adopted on August 2 and August 9, 1990, and March 20, 2003, to deal with that emergency must continue in effect beyond August 2, 2003. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to Iraq.

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress.

GEORGE W. BUSH

THE WHITE HOUSE, July 31, 2003.

Hey a**hole, you f***ing OWN IRAQ. You are now effectively sanctioning yourself!

This is beyond belief. Every f***uck**ing day, they top themselves. They apparently are so wigged out on coke, heroin, who knows what else, that they don't know where to find their brains anymore, let alone their hearts (which they never had).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Can someone explain to me...
... how Bush's masters, the U.S. oil companies, can operate in Iraq if in fact Bush extends the sanctions? Their contracts have already been doled out!

I'm confused....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
are_we_united_yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. You're confused?
Just think how W must feel!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
51. "...declared a national emergency..."?
where? which nation is now in a state of emergency? iraq is in a state of emergency "...with respect to iraq..."? that can't be what he means. sounds like he means the u.s. can he possibly have just declared that the u.s. is in a state of emergency? and this is not front page lead story everywhere?

and we "know" "they" are planning another "attack". and saddam is about to be captured, right. and is congress still in session?

holy shit, folks, and you thought 9/11 was big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trek234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #51
58. This happens frequently
Clinton even declared the nation in states of emergency through executive order and few people ever brought it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Since WE are Iraq...are we impossing sanctions against our selves?
or only the Iraqi people? Is this 'Liberation'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. ah, KEEP them poor, hungry, sick, diseased, deformed...
:wtf: made me think they planned on doing anything ELSE????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Is this a joke?
The continued purpose will affect free trade, more than anything at this point, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is the friggin lead story in tomorrow's papers
What else would lead?

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I AM SPARTACUS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. What else would lead?...ummm...Kobe, the Bachelor, and Brittany's baby...
...in other words, anything but real news...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. Stunned
Is * planning on dropping this bombshell and then hiding out at the ranch for 4 weeks? Unfrigginbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. There is no government of Iraq to impose sanctions against
:wtf: are they talking about. We are now currently the government of Iraq so I suppose we are sanctioning ourselves. I am finally coming to the conclusion they really are wigged out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
33. Yeah, see,
the US is now in charge and Botchy Bush and His Bozo Boys have it on good authority that this "US" place is just chocked full of nuqulor bombs and anthrax (they even send that shit through the mail - I-shit-you-not). So, until the UN can get these here "USites" to allow in inspectors, well we're just gonna have to keep them sanctions on. Make no mistake about it, bring 'em on you evildoer USites!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
64. No Bandit, we have never been at war with Eurasia.

We have always been at war with East Asia.

Always....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. I bet the Iraqis sure love the taste of freedom
Because Georgie isn't going to give them one drop more than that.

W is starting to make Caligula look like a nice guy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #14
65. Not that bad yet. Pray it never gets that bad.

True: We have bread and circuses to keep the masses hypnotized: FAUX news, Joe Millionaire and all the other crap that passes for entertainment.

True: He is planning on killing those that he chooses to, through military trial at GITMO, and yes he may have already killed some.

He hasn't made the senators' wives and boys take part in a palace brothel.

But he hasn't proclaimed himself to be of Divine Majesty, yet, so we still have some time.

Remember what happened to Caligula.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. These folks haven't a clue
Why make the children and sick suffer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Starve them into submission, naturally...
Almost worked for Hitler at Leningrad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
34. But, are we going to use the "sanctions"
as the excuse for not feeding the Iraqia as we are obligated to do?
"Sorry all you starving Iraqis, we'd love to help you out, but you guys are still under sanctions. He he he."
This move makes a mockery of...of...well, just about everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Code_Name_D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 04:43 AM
Response to Reply #34
63. Good God, you may be on to something there.
What if this is just a cover to explane away mass starvations, or other detiorating conditions wihten Iraq?

Things are getting worse. Its getting harder and harder for the press to spin the idea that Iraqies are truly better of under Bush than Sadam. With American's already growingly scepitical about the war, how would "vigulanti justice" look?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nambe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. These sanctions are separate from UN sanctions.
DeFazio's aide says they permit the US to control industrial and weapons trade for Iraq. Without the US sanctions, France and Russia could resume previously arranged contracts with Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Sleazy....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StandWatie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. ah, I see
Iraq is a threat to the US so only we can take their oil :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. so THAT is what this is about.
now it makes sense. NOt sense, as in, good policy guys! But as in.. wtf are they doing - oh they are going to keep bullying other countries while trying to keep all profits for US and UK based companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Yep..............
they get to keep all of those fat rebuilding contracts for themselves, excluding every other nation from doing so. They have a total monopoly on the infrastructure, import/export, oil distribution, even the government. This will make the BFEE Billions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. With whom
would France and Russia resume business with in Iraq, I wonder. Under the occupation authority I thought the US had control of things like that anyway. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
F.Gordon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
40. Exactly, these are US Sanctions, but.......
I know the White House lawyers are busy trying to figure out a way to ban Gay Marriages, but as I glance over the requirements for continuing these Sanctions....seems Bush* didn't feel the need to abide by the rule of law......

Whenever the President exercises any of the authorities granted by this chapter, he shall immediately transmit to the Congress a report specifying -

(1) the circumstances which necessitate such exercise of authority;

(2) why the President believes those circumstances constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States;

(3) the authorities to be exercised and the actions to be taken in the exercise of thoseauthorities to deal with those circumstances;

(4) why the President believes such actions are necessary to deal with those circumstances;and

(5) any foreign countries with respect to which such actions are to be taken and why suchactions are to be taken with respect to those countries.


Or.....did Bush* meet these requirements in the ONE PARAGRAPH Certification Notice? I don't see it......Also, the literal translation of Bush's* actions would preclude that Iraq is still a threat to the National Security, Foreign Policy, or Economy of the United States. Mission Accomplished????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #40
70. excellent point!
I wonder if you can give a link--or explain where this is from? The section in bold seems to encapsulize all the sins of the admin wrt the invasion of Iraq too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
60. I knew there had to be an angle here
Cheney and Haliburton and the GOP - shameless souless war profiteers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
69. Ahhhh, that sounds like a reason.
I was wondering what difference this declaration would make legally in what the US could do in Iraq. This is one answer--keep out competing interests for a year longer. I do suspect there are also other "advantages" to this--hope some IR and legal minds put their efforts on this.

Also wondering if this isn't proof or a sort that they aren't all that sure that they will have control of things even in the next year. Their talking points are all rosy confidence, but things are not going well, and this IMO is an indication that they know it.

Also, I agree with the posters who suggest that this is possibly an "out" in advance--whatever mess the US makes in Iraq, oh well, but it was out of "our" control, state of emergency, see?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. Hey Nambe, how did you hear about this?
I can't find anything at all in Google News.

Curious Minds want to know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lfairban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. There is a blurb on AP.
- President Bush extended for another year trade sanctions and the freezing of Iraqi government assets.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-2975373,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #26
39. Could this a;sp be a wway for the
Bushites to prevent the Gulf War POWs from getting the compensation that the courts have ordered? That might be the real reason for this charade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Looks that way to me (re vets).
The thought that Iraq "continues to be a threat" to the United States is absolutely ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
24. Another BFEE/PNAC Gang swindle!!!!
It's not about oil!! It's about oil and rebuilding contracts and using up lots of nice weaponery that must be rebought!! This was all laid out in the Cheney national energy plan meetings!! Bastards!!!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
25. Some key words?
"By Executive Orders 12722 of August 2, 1990, and 12724 of August 9, 1990, the President imposed trade sanctions on Iraq and blocked Iraqi government assets. "

Eloriel

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #25
66. The tighter the Chimp's grasp on Iraq

the more the Iraqis will slip from his grasp and resist.

Maybe this is *'s plan: continuous war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
27. This IS a joke right,
thats how I've felt since the chimp's coup, only its never funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
28. WAFFLER - Let's see some media coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sagan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
31. WHAT????

But what about the new "government" of Iraq? And what about the supposed joy of the Iraqi people at their liberation?

Are these sanctions only against the "remnants" of Saddam's regime?

Impose sanctions and go on vacation?????? WTF is going on???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renegade000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
32. *is utterly speechless*
Edited on Thu Jul-31-03 09:32 PM by renegade000
(eery silence)

on edit: my lower jaw is also limply hanging as my sheer bewilderment has rendered my motor function useless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booberdawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
36. A continuing threat???
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
37. How can they be a 'contiuing threat' when it has pretty much been
definitively established that they never were a threat to begin with. The media needs to keep their eye on the ball here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #37
67. Sorry, BillyBunter.

Most of the media have gone on vacation with Chimp, and they won't be coming back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zekeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
38. So, with new sanctions in place
can Halliburton legally operate there? Wouldn't that just be funny as all hell? Seriously, doesn't seem like any of the stuff Halliburton/subsids does there outside of the original cleanup of fires and building of bases. You try to move oil in any significant amount and you are violating your own sanction. Now, of course, that assumes that Halliburton still is a US company - have they moved offshore? Like to see those satellite photos again and see just how much oil is being pumped...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
42. I am speechless
There must be a legal reason, and a profit motive behind it, for this idiotic and insane declaration since the US is the de facto and de jure government of Iraq.

Either that, or they are doing lots of coke in the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
43. So now it's "Starve 'em Out" once again. Kill, Kill, kill, all the women
Edited on Thu Jul-31-03 11:06 PM by KoKo01
and children, all the elderly and innocent. We invade your country to reimpose the sanctions that were promised to be lifted. Because you didn't welcome us we will punish you....grind you under our Bush boots and you will die, die, die.

Sorry........I got off on a rant........this is unbelievable! Did Poindexter suggest it to Bush before he resigned? Sort of a parting idiocy to go along with his "Terrorist Futures Trading?"

I can't even think of an emoticom for something this vile and sick and vengeful..........

On Edit: I see it's Weapons Sanctions now that I read the thread.......however these people have a right to defend themselves and if they can't then the above could still be true. They will be open to brutality from anyone.

This was an Invasion, not a liberation. This should be subject to Geneva Convention and any other accords which were put in place after WWII.

Who would have thought we would see our own country behave like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
44. Oh Ok.
Better stop exporting Iraqi oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L.A.dweller Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
45. Gosh, it's shit like this
that creates terrorists and more attacks against U.S. soldiers overseas.
What is our government thinking??? Why must they always think about their profits and livelihood first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
46. They're really trying for another 911
Remember, Osama said he was going to do something for Iraq AND Bushy is on his month long vacation. Add that to the fact that they were gonna make a online gambling company to bet futures on probable terrorists attacks (like the put options on 911) AND tried to kick air marshalls off of planes...just in time for what I might ask?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sagan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
47. bump for the morning crew

You guys won't believe this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
48. That's a sure way to start the new government off on the right foot, eh?
Edited on Fri Aug-01-03 08:05 AM by GOPisEvil
Thank goodness the adults are in charge now. </sarcasm>

Oh, didn't * declare "mission accomplished" back on May 1? Just checking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
49. I thought the whole purpose of invading Iraq ...
was to free the people of Iraq, including lifting of the sanctions to help them get back on their feet.

This is unbelievable.

Cheers
Drifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheepyMcSheepster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
50. i don't get it?
what's the point? does this make sense to anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. He is doing
this to underscore his phony reason for invading Iraq and killing citizens. It also contradicts the "Mission Accomplished" "Top Gun" swagger on the aircraft carrier.

We should ask: "Which is it GEORGE?? Were you lying THEN or are you lying NOW??"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
53. Why isn't this on the morning news shows?
Maybe I just missed it. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fortyfeetunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
54. Is this sanction designed to smoke out Saddam?
In a twisted sort of way, since there is this 30M bounty on Saddam Hussein's whereabouts, are the BFEE thinking as long as he lives , that he is "still in charge"? So keep the sanctions on, once Saddam Hussein is on the cooling board (you know damn well they want to kill him) that the sanctions will be lifted....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
55. They never cared about the Iraqi people only the oil

Get these people out of the way...we need that oil. America just bought another 2 million SUVs...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeathvadeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-03 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
56. This has go to do with something about selling the oil....
It's got to do with the US not being able to sell the oil or to stop the ability of other companies or the UN to step in and take some of the Pie away from them. So they keep hurting the Iraqie people so that they can get fatter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
57. Kick.
This is just too weird to believe. I'm gonna pass this on to conason and jay Bookman. Somebody needs to follow up on this and find out wtf is going on, or at least make them come up with ajustification for it.

Bizarre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RapidCreek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-03 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
59. I wonder if this applys to Bechtel and Halliburton
as well as everyone else? I'm thinking not. What better way to seal off any chance of competition for your sponsors. This move confirms competely that the US military is being used as a mercenary force.

RC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-04-03 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
61. They Changed It
The BFEE sunuvabitches tossed the original notice down the memory hole. Now it reads this:

Bush Continues National Emergency With Respect to Iraq
Continuation notice cites continued instability in Iraq

President Bush has continued for one year the national emergency with respect to Iraq, citing continued instability in the country, as well as the need to "ensure the establishment of a process leading to representative Iraqi self-rule."


They can censor all they want, we all know what their motivation is.

BTW, did anyone do a screenshot of the original website?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-03 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
68. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC