Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate OKs sweeping bank-reform bill; sends it to Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:21 PM
Original message
Senate OKs sweeping bank-reform bill; sends it to Obama
Source: MarketWatch

Handing President Barack Obama a significant triumph in his efforts to reign in Wall Street after the financial meltdown of 2008, the Senate on Thursday approved the most historic shake-up of the regulation of U.S. banks since the Great Depression.

...

The Senate approved the legislation by a vote of 60 to 39, with the help of critical "aye" votes of three Republican senators, Scott Brown of Massachusetts, Olympia Snowe of Maine, and Susan Collins of Maine.

The new law is expected to be known as the Dodd-Frank Act, named after the legislation's two key sponsors in the House and Senate, Sen. Christopher Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut, and Rep. Barney Frank, Democrat from Massachusetts.

In many cases, such as with big bank capital and leverage restrictions, the bill gives regulators the final say rather than setting hard limits. It is unclear how tough the final bill will ultimately be until regulators approve new rules required by the legislation.




Read more: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/senate-defeats-filibuster-threat-on-bank-bill-2010-07-15?dist=countdown



*yawn*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dammit, WHY are those 3 repube votes "Critical"????
Because otherwise they might threaten to filibuster, but not, you know, actually DO it?

Make the bastards read the phone book for 12 hours at a time if they're going to play that game. Live on CSPAN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. *yawn*
Thats the same reaction Wall Street had when it passed.

Which pretty much says how worried they are about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. They have known it was highly likely since the weekend - and that it was pretty likely
for weeks. They were too close to fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. US Senate sends Obama historic Wall Street overhaul
Source: AFP

WASHINGTON (AFP) – The US Senate gave final approval Thursday to the most sweeping rewrite of Wall Street rules since the Great Depression of the 1930s, handing President Barack Obama a legacy-shaping political victory.

The largely party-line 60-39 vote sent the 2,300-page legislation, designed to rein in risky big bank practices blamed for the 2008 global economic meltdown, to Obama for what was expected to be his swift signature.

Just three Republicans joined 55 Democrats and their two independent allies to pass the measure, while one Democrat opposed the bill.

It was the second historic legislative achievement this year for Obama, who signed a bill overhauling US health care in March but faces eroded job approval ratings in public opinion polls just months before November mid-term elections.


Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100715/ts_alt_afp/usfinanceeconomypoliticsregulatecongressvote_20100715191045
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Another "Historic" Accomplishemnt Under His Belt In Under 2 Years
Incredible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. When the economy crashes and burns again you are right, this bill will be historic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Says The Mighty Kreskin!
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 02:59 PM by Beetwasher
And you're rooting for it to happen. Rah rah. :eyes:

Pathetic and amazing how a bill that has historic regulation and oversight can be bashed by people supposedly clamoring for such things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Is that you Thom Hartmann? Still waiting for DOW to fall below 5000?
Like you predicted last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yup, because if history is any indicator us liberals were always on the wrong side of everything
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 03:16 PM by no limit
you conserva dems were always right. Like when it came to glass-stegal, or the iraq invasion, and countless other issues.

Oh...wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. the 30-year downside trendline was never hit in all of these recent downturns
All kinds of analysts (incl but not limited to Elliott Wave Theorists) say the big correction still has yet to occur.

It's been staved off so far but at great cost to our national debt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Tell us what else you know, Stupendous Yappi!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. Were you in support of the Iraq invasion? Just curious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. No, why do you ask, Mr. Yappi?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
28. And the doomsayers strike again. This bashing of Obama is getting tiresome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. So you are saying this bill will stop the economy from crashing? Am I understanding you right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Wasn't Clinton's bill historic too?
You know, the ones that deregulated the banks to begin with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yes, that was historic.
Some really bad mistakes are historical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. And This Is Historic For Regulating, What's Your Point?
You didn't like that bill so this one MUST be bad, despite the fact it rolls back a lot of the excesses of deregulation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Historic isn't necessarily "good"
It's not even necessarily desireable. And apparently, since we do this every 10 years or so, it's not all that "historic" either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. That's A Pretty Useless Point, So What? This Bill IS Solid, Despite Your Whining
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 03:20 PM by Beetwasher
And your useless opinion of what's "historic".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. And what was so "useful" about yours?
You're the one throwing around the "historic" label. What is so useful about it? Considering that we had an "historic" bill just 10 years ago or so, it would seem "historic" is a pretty weak label.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Excellent news!
Thanks for posting this, it is much appreciated!

Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Keeping my fingers crossed that it actually works. K&R! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. lol "sweeping" bull-fucking-shit
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 02:46 PM by no limit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. I wonder what the original fax looked like. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. *sweeping*?????
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

and a broom WAS involved. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. It's a sad day in American politics when 60 to 39 is barely passing.
H. Reid should have fixed this broken system a long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
23. Yeah....Yeah!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
26. Another luke warm reform bill handing corporations all the exemptions
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 03:56 PM by fasttense
and loopholes they want. Hell, the bill doesn't even close the tax loophole that allows fund managers to pay 15% tax on their income while we all pay 34% on our wages.

Historic alright, historically weak. And that's just the way the Democratic party wants it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
30. Yer doin' a heckuva job Brownie
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC