Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was an Official 'in the Loop'? It All Depends [CONDI BREAKS WITH CHENEY]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 01:41 AM
Original message
Was an Official 'in the Loop'? It All Depends [CONDI BREAKS WITH CHENEY]
hahaha. condi better get her story straight.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/25/politics/25COND.html?ex=1080882000&en=a1d86da312e0483e&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE

Was an Official 'in the Loop'? It All Depends

By ELISABETH BUMILLER

Published: March 25, 2004


ASHINGTON, March 24 — It is a strange occurrence in Washington when members of the well-ordered Bush White House publicly disagree with each other, but it happened on Wednesday.

Condoleezza Rice, the national security adviser, took exception to Vice President Dick Cheney's assertion that Richard A. Clarke, the administration's former counterterrorism chief, was "out of the loop."

On the contrary, Ms. Rice said, Mr. Clarke was very much involved in the administration's fight against terrorism.

"I would not use the word `out of the loop,' " Ms. Rice told reporters in response to a question about whether she considered it a problem that the administration's counterterrorism chief was not deeply involved "in a lot of what was going on," as Mr. Cheney said on Monday in an interview on Rush Limbaugh's radio program.

Ms. Rice painted a distinctly different picture of the involvement of Mr. Clarke, who has prompted furious responses since he asserted in a new book and in testimony on Capitol Hill that President Bush did not heed warnings before the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

"He was in every meeting that was held on terrorism," Ms. Rice said. "All the deputies' meetings, the principals' meeting that was held and so forth, the early meetings after Sept. 11."

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Angry Monkeys are Bad for Business
You know, it's not like they didn't know this was coming. What's up with the failure to get their stories straight? Guess they figured they could just sweep it under the rug like O'Neill, but for whatever reason this time people were paying attention.

They just pooped their collective pants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. i just love how condi said "clarke better get his story straight" and then
screwed the pooch with cheney on clarke in PUBLIC, ON RECORD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
37. Suspicious, I am on serious tin foil alert!
"You know, it's not like they didn't know this was coming."


The book coming out on Monday, 60 Minutes on Sunday, Talk shows Monday, Tuesday, Testimony (televised) Wednesday. White House vetting the book for several months. They should have had an all out assault prepared. Something smells.....sorry folks. Hate to hamper everyone's ecstatic moments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #37
40. Maybe it doesn't' smell...
Maybe it's just so damn true...they just CAN'T defend it!
They are spinning so many lies...they can't keep up or remember them...no matter how long they've have to plan. Everyone one of them is lying! How can they possibly keep up to date? Obviously they can't! They are going down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #37
50. I think it is another sign of the genuine incompetence at Team *
They haven't been able to do anything right.

Examples of some of their bigger screw-ups:

1. Economy was supposed to expand with tax breaks. Oops.

2. Iraqis were supposed to greet us with joy. Oops.

3. We weren't supposed to notice Halliburton and the rest. Oops.

Etc. I can't believe that they are smart enough to have engineered a careful plot over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebel_with_a_cause Donating Member (933 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. If Clarke was "out of the loop," what does that say about Condi?
She has to keep her own base covered. The VP didn't help her case at all. Is he hanging her out to dry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cloud Donating Member (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. Just a thought
When Cheney said that Clarke was not "In the loop" he just hurt his cause right there.

Clarke knows a lot about terrorism. To not have him "in the loop" is a big mistake.

Clarke is right. This administration dropped the ball. Although the freeps would never admit it. They jumped all over Clarke immediately after 60 minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. Excellent point !
Only someone extremely incompetent and completely indifferent to the threat of terrorism would leave someone with Clarke's background and expertise "out of the loop."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. VERY excellent point, Snippy
Edited on Thu Mar-25-04 09:25 AM by rocknation
If Clarke was so "extremely incompetent and completely indifferent to the threat of terrorism" that he was "left out of the loop," he should have been replaced. If he wasn't then WHY was he left out of the loop--because he didn't buy into what the others were doing? Either Cheney and Rice are the ones who are incompetent and indifferent, or Cheney's lying just to cover HIS ass and make Clarke look like the liar!

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelaque liberal Donating Member (981 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
28. Shadow Government?
Perhaps Clarke was out of "Cheney's" loop, and Rice too, for that matter. What happens in that "undisclosed location?"

I remember a story in the Atlanta Journal in 2001 about the existence of a plan to run the government in case of an emergency situation. When the story broke Daschle denied knowledge of it. Of course the story went away the next day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uhhuh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is Distressing
I've noticed this a lot lately. To us, they seem disorganized and stupid, but the fact that the press doesn't give this more than a day's play worries me.

They use the talking point that they feel discredits their target even if it directly contradicts something else aimed at that target the same day. They know there will be little, if any, follow up to find out why they are saying contradictory things.
The fact that the attacks are coming from all angles shows me that they don't worry about facts, they just consider what charges will do the most damage. They probably poll to see what kind of things might discredit someone, and then make the charge. Whether it's true or not doesn't even get considered.
Think about the run up to the war. They had no evidence to support their claims. They made them because those were the ones that needed to be made to get the country behind them. The truth isn't required to make an assertion for them. I think it's only a happy accident for them when a charge they make is true. They don't even worry about it.

That's why I'm worried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
25. Nightline played it up last night
and said quite plainly that it was an out and out lie for Cheney to say Clarke was out of the loop..they said he was The Big Man in the Loop, and the Time magazine editorial writer said Cheney pretty much just put his foot in his mouth with that statement on the Limbaugh show.
Clarke was indeed in the LOOP, and they showed him IN the LOOP on the picture in the White House staff terrorism meetings. He was the man, and thats why the WH is running scared.
Tough shit. They blew it, and they are being exposed for the lying bastards they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
HydroAddict Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. Cheney is so damn arrogant, he deserves this.
I think it's been well established that Cheney does not read the morning talking points memo.

Doesn't he always seem out of step with the rest of the gang?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
36. That's because he's in his own private
undisclosed Spiderhole (out of the loop himself) planning his own takeover of the government when we have the next terrorist attack...and he will be sure that we have one...count on it!

I wonder if the shadow government is composed of all Republicans?
I think the American people deserve to learn more about this plan! Why isn't anyone asking? Curious minds want to know! So do I!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. Well, ummmm....
traditionally, it's the VP who's out of the loop.

Veeps have no real duties, and there's no reason to include them in these meetings, and they rarely are included.

Particularly when they spend most of their time at "undisclosed locations."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 03:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. Ha! according to the article by Plaid Adder on DU home page..
sounds like Bush was "out of the Loop"........and always has been. lol

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. Clarke had access to Bush and Rice which proves he was out of the loop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #19
56. Hi snip, I'm not sure what your reply means but just in case
I was making a joke based on something weird and funny that was in that article on DU home page written by Plaid Adder. She said Clarke talked about Bush "wandering" around in background looking like a lost child or something, wanting "something" to do when all the other officials were busy trying to figure out strategy. Bush is such a flake....like in "loopy"

Clarke was there, and there in MIND and body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MinnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. Rice looks like she has not slept in a week. I think she's getting ready..
...to jump ship.
Ah, wishful thinking.
But I don't think she expected to be called upon to lie this frequently, this blatantly, or this consistently when she signed up to join the Bushita regime.
She may yet crack.
It's a sin to tell a lie, Condi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnOneillsMemory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Visions of pitchforks and torches dancing in her head...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
48. C'mon Condi...
Give up the goods on Smirk and Dickless and the rest of the cabal...President Kerry will pardon you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
12. condi and cheney need to get their story straight
looks like they are the one out of the loop, along with bush of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Ms Rice
She may be Bushco's scapegoat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
14. isn't cheney still spewing saddam/al qauida every chance he gets?!?
sounds like he is out of the loop... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlcandie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
15. I can't say it wouldn't be nice to see that Colon and Condi get what's
coming to them, but if they get ALL of this stuck on them then that is one last arrogant, spiteful, hateful thing this cabal will have done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
16. Watergate Flashback #6
Seems that CondoLizard is being left to "twist slowly, slowy in the wind," doesn't it?

:evilgrin:
dbt

Oops! Here's #7 (in advance of appropriate developments) "Let them listen to what we say, but let them watch what we do." John Mitchell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Love the John Mitchell quote -
is Martha still living?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. No. She died some years back.
IIRC, she was talking about a "conspiracy" and how the Nixonians were trying to "silence" her. Interesting in light of what we've learned about the Pugs since then...

:freak:
dbt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susu369 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Martha Mitchell -
died from cancer at age 57. Rest in peace.

Psychologically, I find Cheney's phrase "out of the loop" very telling.

Remember Bush The First lied to the public when he claimed he was "out of the loop" on Iran-Contra? That phrase forever linked Bush to being either a liar or incompentent - or both. (Hey, Cheney, got something from the past sticking in your craw?)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #21
34. Remembering those days in the 70's how they sedated that
poor lady locked in a room to keep her quiet, while John testified?

And how can anyone forget Bush senior lying to the public when he claimed he was "out of the loop" on Iran/Contra. In reality Mr. Bush was a liar and incompetent. Remember when he said he didn't know that supermarkets had scanners? When most had them for five years or more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #34
42. Pubbies lie so much they can't keep straight who is "in the loop" and who
is the designated fall guy when the sh*t hits the fan. It seems that Clarke has completely flummoxed them.
Worst political week of the * presidency. Hands down. And I haven't forgotten the defection of Jeffords (Oh happy day!).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #34
43. oops. duplicate post. Ignore.
Edited on Thu Mar-25-04 10:49 AM by yellowcanine

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuttle Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
22. Jon Stewart has some great observations
especially the one about McClellan, countering that Bush 'wasn't in the Situations Room on Sept 12..." to question Clarke's timeline.

Stewart did one of his trademark quadruple-takes and said "If Bush wasn't in the Situations Room on September 12, when has he EVER been in there??? It's time to take the plastic off the chairs in there and use it!"

For this comment, there was the most robust applause I've ever heard on that show!

Tut-tut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
23. They really can't have it both ways, can they?
Either Clarke was not in the loop and therefore they were negligent for not having him in the loop OR he WAS in the loop and they ignored his advice. Either way, they don't look so good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. That sums it up perfectly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barkley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #23
32. Good point - n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #23
33. How can you not have your top terrorism expert and a man that ...
had been on the job longer than anyone in the administration not in the loop? Sounds like there wasn't any loop at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #33
38. Maybe the loop is shaped like the infinity sign and never ending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #38
47. Maybe this picture of Bush illustrates the loop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #38
55. that, and worse
here's their loop:



a single side and it never ends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #33
52. No loop is about right.
"Perhaps Dick felt that he had, you know, less — he didn't sit with Powell and Rumsfeld and so forth," Ms. Rice said. "It's just not the way we operate. I did sit with Powell and Rumsfeld and Tenet."

Sounds like they were all sitting around on their hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bmbmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
27. This will put an end
to the Rice for VP speculation. She is being groomed for the scapegoat role. Clarke got accolades for being the first to apologize to the families for his part in the failure. Look for Rice to apologize at some point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #27
46. I was just about to post the same thing...
then I saw yours :)

No way, no how, can she be a vp consideration now.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
29. She has to say that
If Clarke was out of the loop, then Dr. Rice can be accused of not doing her job. It was her responsibility as National Security Advisor to keep the couterterrorism chief in the loop.

Does Cheney clear his lies with anyone before he tells them? I doubt it. He was the one who kept on talking about Saddam's association with terrorism after the rest of the liars gave up on that one.

Cheney really needs to check with the liar-in-chief before he speaks. Rove must feel terribly dissed.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #29
53. "Rove must feel terribly dissed."
LOL!!

Yes, I imagine they are snapping and snarling at one another pretty good right about now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barkley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
30. Here's more amo for the Democrats
Edited on Thu Mar-25-04 09:49 AM by Barkley
Let hope they use it against Bush in the 2004 campaign.

Clarke's testimony proves once again that Bush is not qualified to be President.

The press has invested considerable time into Clarke. For Cheney to say he's wasn't in the loop, is also an implicit attack on the media.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
31. Shrub's official response to Clarke's book -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
74dodgedart Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
35. Maybe Cheney wasn't in the loop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
39. America must hear from Condi Rice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
41. Oops - more evidence that Clarke caught the Bushbots with their pants down
(sorry about the negative mind picture that the headline might have triggered about your favorite bushbot)

They haven't gotten the "story" straight. They are so busy flinging mud hoping something will stick that they forgot to make sure they are all reaching into the same bucket of mud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
44. Perhaps the Dr. realizes the ridiculousness of the claim
that THE "counterterrorism chief" could possibly be out of the loop on counterterrorism efforts. If that claim is even remotely possible, this administration should be impeached for criminal incompetence for keeping the "counterterrorism chief" out of the loop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OilemFirchen Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
45. "I would not use the word `out of the loop,' "
Math not her strong suit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Ha. She meant "phrase"
English not a strong one in that case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. i would not use the word "out of the loop" either, condi, because it's not
a word, IDIOT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
54. Can we ever have a Republican administration that doesn't ...
use the lame "out of the loop" excuse? When did they first coin this anyway? I'll bet money it was Rummy that first thought it up back in Nixon's term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC