Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Amnesty International) Report 2010: Global justice gap condemns millions to abuse

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
demoleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 09:42 AM
Original message
(Amnesty International) Report 2010: Global justice gap condemns millions to abuse
Source: AI

A global justice gap is being made worse by power politics despite a landmark year for international justice, said Amnesty International today in its annual assessment of human rights worldwide.

Launching Amnesty International Report 2010: State of the World's Human Rights, which documents abuses in 159 countries, the organization said that powerful governments are blocking advances in international justice by standing above the law on human rights, shielding allies from criticism and acting only when politically convenient.
...

Amnesty International also called on G20 states that have failed to fully sign up to the International Criminal Court – USA, China, Russia, Turkey, India, Indonesia, and Saudi Arabia – to do so. The international review meeting on the court, beginning in Kampala, Uganda on 31 May, is a chance for governments to show their commitment to the court.

Read more: http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/report-2010-global-justice-gap-condemns-millions-abuse-2010-05-27



link to the report:
http://thereport.amnesty.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't it odd that our own Department of State
does not enforce foreign policy with regard to a single uniform standard for human rights? The only things we really take seriously on the world stage are our sovereign economic and strategic interests.

In the 21st century you'd expect us to be a bit further along than the 18th century in our foreign policy standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burnsei sensei Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. In the 18th century,
people, even with modest education, were taught chiefly to distinguish between acting on principles and acting on narrow interests.
We have narrowed the criteria for reflecting on the past and present because we don't want to see the true effects of our actions.
I have written this before, one of the things the present administration could do to get into my good graces is to sign on to the ICC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC