Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kansas senators threaten action over moving Guantanamo detainees to Leavenworth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 02:57 PM
Original message
Kansas senators threaten action over moving Guantanamo detainees to Leavenworth
Source: KTKA

Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., who has threatened to shut down the Senate if President Obama tries to send Guantanamo Bay detainees to Leavenworth, has placed “holds” on Obama appointees.

In a news release, Roberts said Thursday that he and U.S. Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., have put holds on key Obama Administration appointees to the justice and defense departments.

The senators said the holds will remain in place “until they receive answers from the White House regarding recent press reports that decisions have been made to locate Guantanamo Bay detainees in Leavenworth, Kansas, or Standish, Michigan.”

Read more: http://www.ktka.com/news/2009/aug/06/kansas_senators_threaten_action_over_moving_guanta/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Guess Obama should start making 'recess appointments' next week, uh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. what a couple of fucking lilly livered cowards
Hey Pat, Sam, Leaven worth is a fucking prison. Bars, locks, guards with guns, razor wire. It is very unlikely these people could get out. If they did I am sure they wouldn't get far.
How in the hell did we win WWII?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. We won WWII by dropping nukes on Japan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. The anti-nuke crew would have you believe that the war was in the bag.
The pro-nuke crowd would tell you that we were going to win but at the cost of millions of more lives.

Regardless, I think you're oversimplifying the efforts that went into WWII.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. We were winning, and we had the bomb...
but Hitler was about to get the bomb, and we were first
in that thanks to OUR german scientists, who were probably
no more skilled than Germany's german scientists, and no
one knew that frightening fact better than our german
scientists, who said so.

So in the end the decision came down to an assessment
that if the war continued Hitler would get the bomb,
and would not hesitate to use it, and millions would die.
We remember also that millions WERE dying in Hitler's Holocaust,
(so obviously, Hitler wasn't really joking or delusional about
Germany's getting "super weapons" to be delivered by
rockets which would then win the war, and we knew that,
and that Hitler was not even slightly conflicted about using
such weapons.)

and even if he didn't get the bomb soon enough, many would
die in conventional fighting.

So cold calculus of logic weighed the war advantage while
the human calculus weighed the human cost, including the terrible
and possibly apocalyptic future foretold by use of atomic/nuclear
weapons in future wars, based on the precedent.

It was an unbelievably horrifying decision for a single man to make.
And to use it on civilian targets??? God have mercy.
For how do you weigh and judge such a thing? By what rules, what principles?
It is the first decision of its kind in human history. The precedent
examined for guidance in future such decisions.

And somehow the decision, and others to follow (JFK, Cuban missile crisis)
managed a precarious balance so that, to date, 60 years of atomic weaponry
development later ** only two bombs have been dropped in anger.

Was use of the Nagasaki bomb controversial? For pity sake, what could be MORE so?
Was it the right decision? Thankfully, it was not mine to make. Thankfully.

----
**"Fat Man" was the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki in 1945, 0.02 Megatons, equivalent
to 1 gram of mass conversion E=mc2. Andre Sakarov was a principle project
scientist (later dissident over use of nuclear weapons) on the Russian "Ivan"
bomb (aka Tsar Bomb), which was tested in 1961 and yielded 50 megatons,
the equivalent of 2500 Nagasaki bombs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Cowards for sure! That prison houses murderers who have eaten the brains of their victims. But,...
somehow, those being held in Gitmo are just too dangerous for the guards in Kansas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I think it's more dangerous
For the detainees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. I think they are afraid they will get out and come after them, they are so guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
23. Agreed. If the regular inmates got their hands on them... (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. EXACTLY!!!!!!!
I thought the Republicans were tough as nails??? They have no problem at all shipping our military around the world to fight wars but they can't add some hard core folks to the thousands of hard core folks they already have at Leavenworth...We have worse American terrorist in there already!

NO ONE HAS EVER ESCAPED OUR SUPERMAX PRISONS!

Republicans are PUSSIES!

sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds like it's time to move Leavenworth to another state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. remember john gotti.
he was in prison in marion, ill. spent 23 hours a day in his cell. when his family came to visit their conversations were taped.

we can't do the same with prisoners from guantanamo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Move Roberts and Brownback to another country. Maybe Guantanamo. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. Of course they do. Everyone knows that Leavenworth is a joke and prisoners escape routinely.
:sarcasm:

Run for your lives, Kansans!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. NO ONE HAS EVER ESCAPED from a U.S. maximum security prison.

NO ONE.



I add this, BC just in case anyone here is confused. 2 things the U.S. has down PAT:

+selling weapons
+imprisoning people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. Brownback (verb): To smear santorum on one's backside. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kckc Donating Member (299 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. as someone who lives in the area
I hear this crap constantly. The other argument Roberts is making is that terrorists will be invading this country trying to get to their imprisoned brethren, thus putting us all in graaaaave danger (cue scary music). I know, I know, but that is his argument, and he hasn't had much trouble whipping the locals into a frenzy over the whole issue.

(I couldn't open the link- sorry if this is mentioned in the story).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. They probably didn't get the memo...
As to which party won the election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. With 60 Democrats?
:rofl:

Shut down the Senate.:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
17. Pat Roberts is a tool in every meaning of the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crowman1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. Does he think the terrorists have special superpowers that can help them escape?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. They are the real terrorists.
And they oppose what could bring more jobs to their state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. I wonder what the Senators response would have been back in the 1940s
Edited on Thu Aug-06-09 05:36 PM by DURHAM D
when the U.S. Government brought many captured German soldiers to live in Kansas. They were put in camps but went out during the day to work on the farms.

Actually they turned out to be good farm workers and the the farmers really appreciated the cheap labor since their own boys were fighting in the Pacific or in Europe. One of those German soldiers remained after the war and married my great aunt. He loved his "prison" experience in Kansas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
24. I guess they are saying Leavenworth is not a secure Prison.
That should make people in Kansas feel real secure. Their federal Prison can not hold prisoners according to their US Senators...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
25. There are ALREADY terrorists at Leavenworth
That's what so insane about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
26. My grandfather was sent there in 1918 for refusing to participate in World War I
Edited on Fri Aug-07-09 10:09 AM by slackmaster
He was pardoned by President Wilson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
27. I don't want these prisoners in Michigan. Neither does our governor.
Why are only these two states options? Send them to Texas, or New York.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC