Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Feinstein Urges President Obama to Withhold Judgment on Prosecutions Related to CIA Interrog

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 09:57 AM
Original message
Senator Feinstein Urges President Obama to Withhold Judgment on Prosecutions Related to CIA Interrog
Source: Senator Feinstein

Washington, DC – U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, today urged President Obama to withhold judgment on potential criminal prosecutions related to CIA interrogations until the committee completes its review of the Agency’s program.

Here is Senator Feinstein’s letter to the President:

April 20, 2009

The President
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20500

Dear Mr. President:

I am writing to respectfully request that comments regarding holding individuals accountable for detention and interrogation related activities be held in reserve until the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence is able to complete its review of the conditions and interrogations of certain high value detainees.

This study is now underway, and I estimate its completion within the next six to eight months. A study of the first two detainees has already been completed and will shortly be before the committee.

Sincerely Yours,

Dianne Feinstein
United States Senator


Read more: http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=NewsRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=c8e4ceb8-5056-8059-7617-2fc6d556e11e
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. I thought it was perfectly clear without waiting 8 months
The administration responsible for carrying out torture was the Bush/cheney administration. Maybe she doesn't know that? Bush as president then was ultimately responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't trust Diane Feinstein. Wasn't she the ranking member
of this committee the entire time this torture program was in place? If so, she was briefed . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. In a thread in GD, "DiFi says that it wasn't CIA officers who tortured but
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. See what I mean?!
She's disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
25. She openly supported torture AND wiretapping. We picketed her office many times.
It did no good whatsoever. I mean a lot of people not just a few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. I would like to think it's because she wants to do the right thing...HOWEVER...
hiistory has shown this is just another ego-inflated power grab by DiFi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. Another Jane Harman?
Wouldn't be surprised.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. She was actually PO'd that Jane Harman didn't get appointed to head of CIA!!
Edited on Tue Apr-21-09 11:27 PM by cascadiance
Remember that little set of bad feelings she voiced when Panetta got appointed?

http://www.wowowow.com/post/sen-feinstein-hits-back-against-obamas-cia-pick-rep-jane-harman-passed-over-job-167674

And you know that as the Senate Intelligence Committee Chair, she had to know that Harman was being looked at for this AIPAC thing at that time too! What does that make her agenda in this mess?

Delay another 8 months? F' NO! We should be able to do it NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why in the hell would he pass Judgement at all? He's in the Executive Branch. Not the Judiciary.
This is the problem we had with Bush. Legal Questions were being decided by the Executive Branch and Congress. Hell they even used polls. Legal decission were being render by any and everyone but the Courts. Obama is Supposedly a Constitutional Scholar. It's now time for him to show that at the very least he knows that determinations of Guilt or Innocense are made by a Judge or Jury. Not a President or Congress. It's way past time for the president and Congress to quit playing Judge and Jury on this. That is the Judicaries job. It's time to let them do that job. The only thing they can accomplish is obstructing justice. It doesn't mean a damned thing at this point for a President or Congress to find them guilty. That must be done by the courts. If Congress wanted to find them guilty. They could have done that through Impeachment. They let that opportunity slip through fingers. It's too late for that now. The only decission Obama has to make is to allow holder to pursue Justice IN THE COURTS or to issue Bush & Cheney a full pardon. THAT'S IT! Nothing more and nothing less. Pardon or prosecute. Decide wisely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUlover2909 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I agree. Well put. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Perhaps she should have used different words.
I'm supposed to be a lawyer, and I took her words as a request to the President and the executive branch to put off any decisions to prosecute or take administrative action until the Senate committee has finished its investigation.

Before executive branch lawyers bring a suit, either in court or before administrative law judges, the lawyers are supposed to do a thorough investigation. Then the lawyers, the policy folks and the political folks make a decision on whether to move forward based on the strength of the evidence and on policy and political considerations. No decent lawyer goes around half-cocked filing suits that he or she knows very little about, and the Obama administration is filled with a lot of much-more-than-decent lawyers.

Here, IMHO, Sen. Feinstein is not using the phrase "passing judgment" to refer to the ultimate court decision, but to the executive or prosecutorial decision to move forward, or not, in a court of law or an administrative hearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Exactly, thank you. I was just about to point
that out myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlingBlade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. K & R, Dianne Feinstein should be
Immediately water boarded in order to find the truth !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dumak Donating Member (397 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. LOL, she writes him an open letter to tell him to shut his mouth
Definitely playing politics for the next election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. His comments so far have exonerated them from punishment; perhaps she sees that as
poor judgement or at the least precipitous action. Why is it just assumed that Feinstein is in error in this instance and not Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freemarketer6 Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
10. Diane Feinstein needs to be booted from office..........nft
dd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sansf Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. Don't get your hopes up
Di always gets her verbal dander up when her power is rivaled. She will say the right things, and then vote the wrong ways (Mukasey, Alito, etc. ad nauseum).

Even if she was not being blackmailed too (a la NSA), she is a hopeless corporatist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. May California kick her out of office!!! She supports SICK acts of crime!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
18. "Please don't interfere with our whitewash junior. We're good at it.
And anyway we got a tip from a 'friend' that there might be a little distraction on the horizon to get everybody back on board the gravy train so please cool your jets."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. I just keep thinking of Senate Intel Phase II
(PreWar Iraq)-- 2+ years, was it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. All of these investigations are separate!
Let the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence do it's thing. Let a special prosecutor do their thing.

What I predict is that there will be many strong attempts to minimize and blur the truth of what happened. Discrediting of Holder, attempts to discredit the truth.

I'm afraid we've reached a critical point in America. We were asleep when Reagan sold arms to Iran. But now there is enough water under the bridge that we simply cannot ignore the facts.

I see this as being similar to the bundling of toxic mortgages. So many people were marginally involved because they knew they could get away with it. Profiting from the war, mainly. This is about money. Just as the economic meltdown is about money. War is about money.

I'm afraid the time of reckoning is here. Short of repeating historical disasters in American history, I believe we are going to see the eclipse of Watergate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. Di-Fi's Whitewash (emptywheel)
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/02/27/difis-whitewash/

Worries about a Limited Hangout back in February when it was announced,
but too much is out there, now.

http://www.democrats.com/dianne-feinstein-plans-torture-coverup

For example, reports/data on torture-deaths...

http://www.democrats.com/torture-deaths
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
22. since Feinstein is a war profiteer and back Iraq War, she has no credibility when she says to wait
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
24. She was one of the big torture supporters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC