Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FDIC’s Bair Says Credit ‘Thawing,’ U.S. Plans Working (Update1)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 11:37 PM
Original message
FDIC’s Bair Says Credit ‘Thawing,’ U.S. Plans Working (Update1)
Source: Bloomberg

March 24 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila Bair said credit markets are showing signs that liquidity is returning, and banks are starting to make money as government rescue programs begin working.

“I’m starting to get more optimism,” Bair said today in an interview on Bloomberg Television. “I think we are seeing some signs of thawing, some signs of improvement.
Many banks are making money.”

U.S. efforts to end the worst financial crisis in more than seven decades, including $700 billion to rescue financial firms, are “starting to work,” Bair said. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner yesterday unveiled the latest plan, buying stressed assets using as much as $100 billion remaining in the bailout program. Bair called it “an important cleansing process” to revive the financial system.

The Federal Reserve will partner with private investors to buy the securities and the FDIC will guarantee the pools of real-estate loans to attract buyers. Bair said the program is part of an “exit strategy” to wean investors from public funds and bring private capital back into the banks.
“Even though they might have to take some loss initially to sell them, we think this is going to bolster their ability to raise some private capital,” she said. “Longer term, it’s going to be a critical part of cleansing the balance sheets.”



Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aVitBWg8Ej60&refer=home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. The biggest mistake we made with TARP was not compelling (yes, compelling) lending
We should have ordered all banks taking TARP to step up the lending.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Don't forget, 'we' had nothing to do with it.
There needed to be parameters, and there were none. That damned 'regulation'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. And a few days ago she was seeing no sunlight? Why should I
believe anything she says???

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=8272727

FDIC's Bair: 'too big to fail' strategy must end
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. What does one have to do with the other? She doesn't...
think highly of one aspect of the current strategy, but does see some light at the end of the tunnel.

(And for that matter, why should I believe anything a blogger has to say?)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Good point about a blogger, but changing tunes in the
middle of a negative rant concerns me. So now she's accepting, with reservations? Okay.

That I can relate to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I don't see that she is talking about the same things
in the two instances you are comparing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I do. She claims it couldn't work, and then claims it's looking better? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. You must be referencing something other than the link you provided
because in the link you provided, she is criticizing the lack of a government regulatory agency (like the FDIC, but for business)to step in and keep businesses in check before the problem becomes only solvable by a massive bailout... because the company was "too big to fail". There is no dissonance that I can find between those statements and the ones in the op.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Sorry, I just find it amazing that in 5 days she changes her tune.
What will she say tomorrow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. She.Did.Not.Change.Her.Tune.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. She didn't change her tune. You just aren't understanding what she is talking about.
In one case she is in a discussion about what to do going forward RE: regulating big financial institutions. In the other case she is talking about the various policies and programs that we are doing right now to deal with the fact that we didn't change the regulatory structure a long time ago. Changing the regulatory structure now will not help fix the past but will stop it from happening again. Meanwhile the programs they have, unfortunately, had to do this time are working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. I just got a commercial loan from a small community bank. The loan officer worked
Edited on Tue Mar-24-09 11:49 PM by Bread and Circus
me hard to see if there's anything more I'd want to borrow. He said "we have tons of money to loan" and he seemed really serious about it. It's a conservative bank, so I took that as a good sign.

BTW, the loan was to start a new small business...not to float payroll or anything like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. We hav several small banks out here that..
are in great shape. They hold their mortgages and most other loans so they kept their lending standards up and they have loads of cash on hand. Banks don't make money sitting on cash, so they are looking to lend.

The curious problem they have is that their standards are still high so while they have money to lend, they have fewer customers who meet those standards.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Coast2020 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. I have not dealt with a bank since early 80's.
I have always relied on my Credit Union in Oregon. I have been with same CU since then--roughly 1985. There is a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antimatter98 Donating Member (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
14. Except for 600K/unemployed per month, 75,000 foreclosures/mo, its working great---for the banks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. I've never had a problem getting a loan.
I get 2 to 3 ads a week in the mail for each category - car loans, house mortgages, new credit cards. I could get a loan tomorrow and have the money in my hands by the end of the day. The Real problem is getting a JOB to pay it back. Until we get JOBs, nothing the gubermint does to prop up the cheats and liars at the banks/Wall Street firms will make a bit of difference to the Real economy.

We need JOBs NOT LOANS. I thought this game of giving the middle class loans instead of good paying JOBs was over.

By the way, where is the results of the stimulus??? All those tax cuts the Republicons fought for, I've not seen a bit of it. Have you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pam4water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'd like to see some real numbers to back this up.
Edited on Wed Mar-25-09 09:02 PM by pam4water
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC