Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama, Gates at Odds Over New Whistleblower Protections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 10:03 PM
Original message
Obama, Gates at Odds Over New Whistleblower Protections
Source: Washington Post

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

During an election featuring Democratic allegations that U.S. intelligence was distorted to justify a misbegotten war, Barack Obama endorsed new protections for national security officers who blow the whistle on abusive, corrupt or illegal behavior, by offering them the right to sue for damages and challenge denials of their security clearances.

But by keeping a Republican-appointed secretary of defense strongly opposed to those changes, President Obama is finding the path to a new policy on federal whistleblowing much more complicated.

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and other top Bush appointees wrote an unusually tough letter to Congress last year asserting that the bill protecting whistleblowers would threaten national security, violate the Constitution and undermine the government's ability to safeguard legitimate secrets.

The legislation, passed this year by the House, is still being reviewed by the White House, according to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. "We understand this is an important issue, and we're committed to addressing it in a manner that is consistent with national security," said spokeswoman Wendy Morigi, declining to comment further.



Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/17/AR2009021703006.html?hpid=moreheadlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. "the bill protecting whistleblowers would threaten national security"
Gates now serves at Obama's pleasure, yes?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. And he better remember who the boss is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Somebody should remind somebody
who's boss, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. There's those words again
National Security. It's ALWAYS worked in the past. Bush felt so brave to say to the "terrorist" "Bring it on" well we say "Bring it on". Let the truth be told. Fuck General Betrayus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "BRING EM ON" shouted the AWOL CHIMPANZEE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I haven't seen you around in a while, Saigon...
Hope you're doing well. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChromeFoundry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. that will NEVER get old!!!!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. This sounds like something that can be worked out.
Maybe some protections can be put in, or the rights of the worker can be limited, or time constrained, or something like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pasto76 Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. Violate the Constitution?!?!?!
I dont recall an amendment from civics class saying corrupt or illegal behavior in the guise of government is protected. Is there something I missed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. Some interesting reading here...
kind of puts things in perspective.

U.S.Foreign Policy and Pentagon
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Foreign_Policy/US_ForeignPolicy.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. Come on President Obama
In less than a month Gates has already opposed you on two major National Security matters, Iraq withdrawal time and now this. Why keep this fuckhead as SOD any longer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
12. Snort
go figure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. Toss him
Tell him his year went by quickly and nominate Bunnatine Greenhouse for Secretary of Defense. Remember her? I think she would have the right perspective on whistle-blowers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC