Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Urges Tighter Controls to Stop Nuclear Arms

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodbarnett Donating Member (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:12 AM
Original message
Bush Urges Tighter Controls to Stop Nuclear Arms
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush (news - web sites) on Wednesday called for limiting nuclear technology to only those countries that forswear atomic weapons and said an intensive global effort is needed to stop a nuclear black market.

Bush, in a speech at the National Defense University, highlighted his national security credentials, a central theme of a re-election campaign that intends to focus on what Bush is doing to protect the United States following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

Terrorists and terrorist states are in a race for weapons of mass murder, a race they must lose," Bush said.


Bush described the black market that was run by the father of Pakistan's atomic program, Abdul Qadeer Khan, as a dangerous precedent and gave details of how Khan's secret network was penetrated by U.S. and British intelligence.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=586&e=2&u=/nm/20040212/wl_nm/bush_proliferation_dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Enraged_Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ah, yes. Bush the space pResident didn't work out.
Neither did Bush the aircraft-carrier-landing "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" pResident.

Now it's Bush the disarmament pResident.

When of course, he's ripped up just about every nuclear weapons treaty ever written. And everyone knows it.

I think next week, he should try exposing his breast on national television. Then he can be the hip MTV pResident. Maybe that will work better for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's what I thought
Wasn't it one of the first things he did as pResident to drop out of the non-proliferation treaty and ABM treaty. Now three years later a dim bulb trys to light in his head. C-Span is talking about it now.
:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Dontcha mean
Nu-yah-lur? :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bif Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Excuse me George, who walked away from the ABM Treaty?
You hypocrate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bif Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Nu-cu-ler weapons
If you can't pronounce them, you shouldn't have your fingers on the button that can unlease them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. His words have no weight since he withdrew from nonproliferation,...
,...treaties and his administration is bent upon new nukes development and building/spreading commercial fast breeder nuclear plants. As usual, his "speeches" are merely cover for underlying motivations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. Then why did you gut Clinton's
effort to secure former soviet stockpiles of weapons?

Just another bit of Rovian spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. so why did he back off of "Dr. Strangelove"?
http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=312&row=0

---------
The Bush Administration has expressed shock at disclosures that Pakistan, our ally in the war on terror, has been running a nuclear secrets bazaar. In fact, according to the British news teams' sources within US intelligence agencies, shortly after President Bush's inauguration, his National Security Agency (NSA) effectively stymied the probe of Khan Research Laboratories, the Pakistani agency in charge of the bomb project. CIA and other agents told BBC they could not investigate the spread of “Islamic Bombs” through Pakistan because funding appeared to originate in Saudi Arabia.
-------------------

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progress Donating Member (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. If he's so worried about terrorists...
...why did he lose track of all that nuclear material in Iraq? I'd like to know where all that ended up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC