Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. House Vote Says Cigarettes are Drugs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 05:25 AM
Original message
U.S. House Vote Says Cigarettes are Drugs
Source: BBC News

US vote says cigarettes are drugs

About one in five adults in the US still smokes

The US House of Representatives has voted to treat tobacco as a drug and have it regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The bill would tighten restrictions on advertising, impose new penalties for selling to children and require all new products to be approved by the FDA.

But the White House threatened to veto the bill, saying it would put an enormous burden on the FDA.

- snip -

The bill cleared the House with a 326 to 102 vote, as 96 Republicans ignored the president's position and voted in favour of the bill. The programme would be funded by levying millions of dollars in fees from the tobacco industry. Senator Edward Kennedy hopes to get the legislation before the Senate by the end of the year.

- snip -

Representative Henry Waxman has been trying to get the House to pass tobacco regulation legislation for more than a decade. "This is truly a historic day in the fight against tobacco," he said.

Read more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7534705.stm



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. turn all the tobacco farmland to switchgrass
and build ethanol plants there, instead of the sweetheart deals in the midwest using corn, which is a breakeven (at best) source of energy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jester Messiah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Or Marijuana fields, if Mr. Frank is successful.
I, for one, wish him godspeed. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
54. make it hemp, and get rid of the cotton fields too...
Edited on Thu Jul-31-08 04:45 PM by QuestionAll
hemp makes a better cloth fabric, and cotton is one of the WORST crops, as far as use of petro-chemical fertilizers and pesticides is concerned. no such need with hemp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh no! I actually agree with Bush. Well, a broken watch is right twice a day.
Interesting concept tobacco as a "drug." So if I can get my doctor to write me a prescription for my cigarettes. They become a tax deductible medical expense. Will my prescription plan help cover the rising expense of cigarettes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Nicotine is the drug
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. I'm well aware of that. I'm kinda being treated with Nicotine.
I'm 6' 11". One of the things people my size have to worry about is enlarged heart and veins. Nicotine is a vasoconstrictor. So it prevents my heart and veins from enlarging. Last year I cut down from two packs a day to one. I recently talked to my doctor about cutting down to half a pack. He told me that if I cut down or quit smoking. He will prescribe me nicotine patches that would keep my nicotine levels around a pack per day. He says the Nicotine is working well and sees no need to find other ways of preventing my heart and veins from growing. The nicotine patches I could write off as a medical expense. But not my cigarettes even though it accomplishes the same medical objective. So I'm wondering if this would change that and allow my doctor to write me a prescription for cigarettes and allow me to write off my cigarettes as a medical expense. We have medical marijuana. Why not medical tobacco?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. With cigarettes you get the lung pollutants.
I used to smoke. And I really enjoyed it. But I'm glad I quit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
44. My lungs are fine. But that could be because of my size. It always takes more with me.
I make anesthesiologists crazy. They have to give me what is usually a fatal dose to knock me out. Because of this they are always double, triple, and quadruple checking their calculations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #44
74. ask not for whom the bell tolls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
go west young man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's hard to disagree with a dictionary.
Drug definition: A chemical substance, such as a narcotic or hallucinogen, that affects the central nervous system, causing changes in behavior and often addiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
25. That means that caffeine is a drug also
Should we have the FDA regulating coffee now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. Uh, caffiene is already labeled as a drug.
Caffeine is a bitter white crystalline xanthine alkaloid that acts as a psychoactive stimulant drug and a mild diuretic (speeds up urine production) in humans and other animals

From wikipedia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
70. That covers refined sugar...which is the true gateway drug
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raebrek Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Hmmmm
Walmart will sell a 30 day prescription for 4 dollars. I have to wonder if the government taxes any other drugs as hard as they do cigarettes.

Raebrek!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. You seem to have a warped idea of what a drug is
Of course nicotine is a drug....The same as THC is a drug in Pot..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
42. It might be you. I'm 76 and old school when it comes to medicines.
As a kid when I got Poison Ivy. Mom went to the neighborhood Apothecary to get some camphor oil to relieve the itching. No prescriptions. At most a note from the doctor telling the apothecary what to give you. Then came patent medicines and the druggist. The apothecary shops started carrying the Patent medicines. They were called that because you could obtain a patent for them and actually own them. You could even prevent others from copying and selling your drug. You couldn't do that with the apothecaries remedies. They were made of natural substances. You cannot patent them. You cannot own them. It was universally held that God was the Inventor of natural substances and therefore no man could own them. So anybody could make and sell camphor oil. It was up to the Apothecary to decide who had the best quality that he would sell. Then over time the druggist took over the Apothecary shops. Now they are all Pharmacies. But what it comes down to is that every synthetic drug has a natural model. Digitalis is modeled after Foxglove and Valium is modeled Valerian etc. I only consider man made synthetics to be drugs. Non patentable natural substances like Nicotine and THC Delta 9 are not drugs. They are just naturally occurring substances. Because every drug is modeled after a natural substance. Both natural substances and drugs can be used as medicines. I have seen the definition of drug greatly shift over my life time.

There is also a movement that want to shift the meaning of drug even further. If the neutraceutical movement has it's way. You won't be able to get a 1-a-Day vitamin without a prescription.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Interesting concept? Cigs are legal but they are more definitely
"drugs".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
45. That depends on how you define drug. It has an ever expanding and changing meaning.
Edited on Thu Jul-31-08 03:35 PM by Wizard777
I can honestly say it doesn't mean what it used to. In my younger days. Drug only applied to what was also called patent medicines. Now there is a group that wants to expand the word drug to include Vitamins and Minerals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raebrek Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. So will the FDA now start approving beer too?
Alcohols is a drug.

Raebrek!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'm not sure I like this.
Here's what I don't like about calling tobacco a drug. At this point, it's already known to just about everyone as a drug, one of the few legal recreational drugs out there, along with alcohol and, if you ask Rush Limbaugh, oxycontin.

I've long argued that the best way to kill off the evil powder-and-rock drugs is to make marijuana legal, thus removing millions of users from the opportunity to try other, worse illegal substances.

This move seems to be going in the other, never-has-and-never-will-work path to prohibition. If you think illegal drugs are a problem now, just imagine what would happen if 20 percent of the population has to feed their monkeys by visiting shady assholes who also sell methamphetamines and heroin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-02-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
79. Thanks for this post
I'm personally against the Drug War and going after the tobacco smokers, dippers, and chewers is going backwards in that direction. There are too many users and you are just adding unneccessary roadblocks. While I agree not using any substance is much healthier then even taking caffeine once, they can make it hard and threaten strick penalties involve in the illegal drug trade, it doesn't stop and many users already know what parts of cities and what people to talk to get what is they want. I do too, if I wanted to get Methamphetamine, give me 3 days I'm sure I can find it(I'm not using anything other THC, Caffeine, Alcohol every once in awhile, and nicotine)
But...
The process is dangerous however, international mafias distributes into the US and then a user would endanger himself by buying dope from someone who is probaly paranoid, could be on drugs himself... looking to rip you to support his drug habit, etc

However I believe in my mind as far as health out of the 3 most commonly used substances(excluding caffeine)

Worst for you starting with 1
Nicotine(Cigarette-smokeless form)
Alcohol(much worse then marijuana imo both intoxicating effects and damage to your insides)
Marijuana No known cause of an overdose, though it is possible for someone to have allergic effects, bad trips, or just get too disoriented, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. AMEN! Now classify it as a prescription only drug and save MILLIONS and MILLIONS of lives!
Edited on Thu Jul-31-08 06:55 AM by onehandle
Go Waxman!

I'm sending him some CASH!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. The (Republican) ex FDA head agrees it should be -- and so do I
He believes that people currently smoking should still be allowed to smoke, or helped if they want to quit. NO advertising, NO flashy packaging, and you have to get the cigs at a Pharmacy. He thinks we should help the tobacco farms that are left. I personally think they should be set up to grow hemp: it's sustainable, versatile, and an easy crop to grow and process. He wrote a very good book about this.

Disclosure: I smoked two packs+ a day for over a decade and now have been clean over a decade. Anyone who doesn't believe cigarettes are nothing but burnable syringes is fooling themselves. It is a horrible addiction for many of us causes a very, very nasty withdrawal -- remmeber that when your loved ones are quitting. I was able to quit cold turkey the first time (it sicked), but I can NEVER smoke a single cigarette agin -- I'd be back up to two pavks in less than a week. So many lives and medical dollars are lost every year to people who can't beat this drug. And, remember: like caffeine, nicotine can be taken out of it's substance, so the companies could made non addictive cigarettes. Of course they don't do that, they ADD nicotine. They are evil companies, worse t5han oil companies imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. If they took the nicotine out the cigarette, there would be
need to smoke it, would there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
57. Exactly -- yet they could make it like Decaff coffee if they wanted to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #57
64. Sure but they wouldn't sell enough to make a profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. Bad bad idea
Want to make something go up in value? Want to drive up demand? Make it illegal. Watch gangs to start selling smokes. Stupid, stupid idea.

What works is what we are doing now - education. Every year there are less smokers, partly because they die and partly because kids aren't picking it up like they used to.

Prohibition will reverse all that, and Nicotine will be the new party drug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Oh yeah. Nicotine a "party drug."
I often go to parties and indulge in a drug that in the short term ever so slightly relaxes you.

Alcohol, pot, and pills are party drugs. Cigarettes don't make you high.

You might as well make that analogy about aromatherapy, too.

Nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. Point is you're pushing Prohibition - always a bad idea
Why don't we outlaw the word "fuck" while we're at it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Congress is "pushing" control of an addictive drug. Not prohibition.
So should we do away with the whole prescription system?

Want some Morphine? Run down the the Quickie Mart and get a pack of Morphine 100s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. To be honest - yes. You should be able to buy Heroin without a prescription
Edited on Thu Jul-31-08 04:20 PM by Taverner
The war on drugs is doing no good and lots of harm.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #31
65. We ALL know the only answer is to decriminalize drugs,
but that isn't going to happen. I've given up we'll ever have any sanity on the war on drugs. It does burn me that alcohol and nicotine, the two worst drugs of all are legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. I guess I'll be smuggling in smokes from Mexico
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #9
26. Gee, people simply haven't learned the lessons of Prohibition
All such a move would do is drive the market underground, with all the associated violence and such associated with any such black market good.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Yup - someone never read a history book
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
29. Whaaa? And the war on drugs has been SOOOOO effective
That's just DUMB

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juneboarder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
33. Since when is government regulation good
when it affects your daily life. I am a non-smoker and really hate the smell of cigarettes, but when do you draw the line on government intervention? Cigs are a personal choice and there are laws to prevent 2nd hand smoke and an attempt to keep the air clear for those non-smokers, but we have planes, trains and automobiles. They cause just as much pollutants and damage as cigarettes. Why not ban everything, then we can just sit in our homes and hope to high hell we don't break any government imposed laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Nicotine is an addictive drug,
Line. Drawn.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juneboarder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. What about...
Caffeine and alcohol... those are addictive. What about Chocolate? That is addictive... OH!! Spicy food too... I'm addicted to that shit!! Love the Habanero Hot Sauce!! :)

My point... lots of things are addictive so why pick out nicotine? The government should not be able to dictate what we do when it comes to personal choices.

Sorry, have to throw one more controversial topic out there... ABORTION. Let's make that illegal while we're making cigs illegal. I mean come on... we cannot let the government intervene like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Nicotine is distributed via cigarettes to everyone around you.
Including your children. That's the difference.

Wanna slap a patch on your body and imbibe a drug? Fine. Go crazy.

But don't spray an addictive drug into the general public.

Reminds me of a Steve Martin joke.

"Mind if I smoke?" "No. Mind if I fart? It's a habit of mine."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #41
50. They banned smoking indoors. That's where second hand smoke kills
Not because some guy who lives in the same city you did lights one in a park.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juneboarder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #41
58. I guess we should agree to disagree.
Yes, I am against smoking cigarettes; but at the same time I am also against the government intervening in such a way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juneboarder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #35
59. Can OIL be considered an illegal drug??? :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maeve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
10. So what about the BATF?
Will we have two agencies fighting for turf..again...when it comes to enforcing regulations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. You mean the BATFE
Don't forget Explosives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bean fidhleir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
13. That's one way to get every smoker to vote GOP!
Edited on Thu Jul-31-08 07:37 AM by bean fidhleir
There seems to be no depth of craven stupidity to which the Dems in office won't sink. They grovel and cringe spinelessly to usurpers like BushCo, while taking strong stands against us, EXACTLY the opposite of what they should be doing, if they want our votes.

How stupid do they think we are? And are they right about that? Do the GOP own them outright, or merely have a long-term lease?


(oh, and no I haven't smoked tobacco in almost 40 years)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #13
28. i agree. Progressives who complain about news
Edited on Thu Jul-31-08 11:25 AM by bbgrunt
being controlled, protestors being put behind chicken wire, people being thrown out of various venues because of a t ahirt they might be wearing, etc. etc. are really looking for trouble with this little bit of stupidity.

Just like with controls on abortion and the slippery slope that follows, people who advocate naming tobacco as a drug are like the people in Kansas who vote against their own best interest. Designating tobacco as a drug is only the first step down a short path to further restrictions and starting to live your life as property of the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
16. Interesting that these kinds of stories always come from the UK
US Corporate Media can't seem to break these stories
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
20. Bunnypants will veto -
but he won't be there forever....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
37. President Obama will pass this one. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blues90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #37
62. he smokes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #62
68. So?
Are you saying that he'd veto this life saving directive because he's just another addict?

Is that what you're saying?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blues90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #68
71. I can't say , you tell me since your so involved
Lets see , smoking is bad and causes all sorts of health issues.Ok make them a drug and define them as one. Then to make up for the mass taxes collected by state tax on cigs and replace it with what , higher gas taxes. There is always a catch. Or we could raise the sales tax.

This is not to say that I encourage anyone to smoke , I do but I have never encouraged anyone to pick up the bad habit.

You have a solution , lets hear it rather than how it affects you personally. There is no way to make everyone happy ever. so ask someone to give up a habit, then be prepared to also give up a habit that intrudes on someone elses rights.

The reality is any fire that create smoke hot air rises and in no way stays in the breathing range of others unless it's in a closed room or blown directly in someones face.

Heat rises. Even if I did not smoke I would feel it's insane to ban smoking outdoors.

Everyone complains yet they only have the simple side that is fed to them without thinking beyond that .

To make a drug does nothing. We have all sorts of drugs that are legal yet worse than street drugs that kill and they advertise them on the TV every day .

I suppose then ban the patches people use to quit because they contain nicotine as well. You can buy these over the counter. Ban the gun too and let the smokers go nuts trying to quit. I would say most smokers wishthey never started in the first place so lets make it more difficult to quit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
21. They ARE drugs ..... 20 crack pipes in a pack ....
So: Classify them as drugs ... Then LEGALIZE drugs, TAX them, and provide treatment and education about how to NOT take drugs ....

Freedom is a wonderful thing .... so is consistency ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
22. I've been hoping for this one for a long, long time
Good on the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
24. The FDA is a JOKE...they can't find their asses with both hands....
....this is just another WASTE of taxpayers time and money. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
27. This one looks like a loser like Prohibition.
Outlawing tobacco products will have the same impact: a lucrative opportunity for organized crime, and a growing lack of respect for the law among citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #27
39. Where in the OP is there anything mentioned about "outlawing"
Seems to me the most one can draw from this is support for increased regulation based on the rational acknowledgment that tobacco is an addictive drug.

Frankly, I think the US is long overdue for that- and ought to follow the lead of nations like Canada and Australia in their efforts to curb nicotine addiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
32. Nanny-stateism at its WORST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. I'm assuming that sarcasm, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. Nope - believe it or not there is nanny state legislation
The war on drugs is a perfect example
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
43. Just let people smoke if they want..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #43
55. and WHAT they want...
:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paladin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
48. There's No Prohibition Of Smoking Involved, Here

And libertarians, kindly spare me your usual Evil Nanny State Jack-Booted Thugs Kicking In The Door wishful thinking, OK? Keep your wet dreams to yourselves, go down and buy a pack of Camels, and simmer down.

Cigarettes are in fact drugs, and it's a move in the right direction to label them as such. Anybody who doesn't think cigarettes are drugs has never personally gone through the painful process of giving them up.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
51. did philip morris die?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
53. Are they going after the cigarette companies for selling drugs? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
56. Put an enormous burden on the FDA? They haven't been doing shit for
eight years other than rubber stamping everything big pharma and big Ag wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
60. U.S. House Vote Says Water is a Liquid
News at 11.

Glad they cleared that up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skoalyman Donating Member (751 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #60
66. careful it may be addictive too
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
61. YAY EXPANDED DRUG WARZ WOOOOO!!! DU has lost it's mind a bit today...
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #61
73. No kidding. Yeah! Let's get Big Pharma involved! Let's ask more
of the completely dysfunctinal FDA! Woohoo! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #61
76. Have YOU lost your mind?
Edited on Fri Aug-01-08 10:06 PM by depakid
Since when does regulation equal a drug war?

That sounds like something the tobacco companies like to say- and get other suckers to believe.

What the legislation will do- among other things- is require disclosure of toxic additives to cigarretes (which are currently protected as "trade secrets," and allow the FDA to regulate additives and nicotine content- as well as oversee claims about "light" or "reduced risk" products.

In other words- what every other western nation already does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #76
78. listen-the tobacco industry is fucking insane too, I agree.
but the last thing we should do it allow another substance to be controlled by the fucking FDA and big Pharma.

Tobacco doesn't need to be a controlled substance, it just needs to be GROWN NATURALLY and processed without chemical additives. If legislation enters the picture, that's where it should be. Problem solved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
63. Oh, for fuck's sake!
What the hell are those of us who only smoke occasionally (when I really need an energy boost) supposed to do? Pay out the nose for this?

And I think whoever said this will make lots of smokers vote Repub was right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skoalyman Donating Member (751 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #63
67. what they really want to do is regulate how much nicotine the
company's can put in cig's and smokeless tobacco in other words water down but that will only make people smoke more.:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
5thGenDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-08 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
69. I'm 52, have had three heart attacks and still smoke
I don't go to bars or restaurants where I might affect some non-smoker's precious pink lung sacs. I'm aware that if I don't quit I'm dead in ten years (or less) and I don't give a shit. I resent Kennedy and Waxman playing Big Daddy with my personal choices.
If the goo-goos out there don't want me to smoke around them, fine. I've already conceded as much (or, more precisely, have already had what used to be a personal choice dictated to me). I pay upwards of $2.50 a pack in taxes here in Michigan -- which was supposed to go to pay for "Smoker Education," or whatever wippy-dip, do-gooder program they sold to us -- but which, in actuality, goes to the Lansing Liquor and Prostitute Fund. I like smoking, I don't smoke around non-smokers and, when it kills me, so fucking what?
Now Waxman and Kennedy want to paint me even farther into a corner. Democrats won't stand up against an illegal, immoral war -- too gutless to take on the most unpopular "President" in history, but want to jump on my dick over smoking.
Fine. If Dale Kildee (my Democratic congressman) votes for this or if Senator Levin does, I'll happily abstain from voting for Congress or Senate in November.
I don't care if it amounts to Sisyphus pushing pork up Parnassus. I'm damned tired of the self-righteous, holier-than-thou non-smokers minding my own business and I hope Bush does veto this. It'll be the first correct thing (IMHO) he's done since his worthless ass hit Pennsylvania Avenue.
John
That's my opinion and I vote. But I don't have to.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #69
72. Well, I hope when it gets you
it is a massive heart attack and you don't feel a thing.

COPD/CHF or lung cancer can be long and drawn out, and really unpleasant, for you and those around you.

I respect your right to say 'fuck it,' just hope you don't regret it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
75. Would that mean my insurance would cover Chantix?
I'm not holding my breath on that one.

Mostly because my lungs aren't what they used to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKthatsIT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-01-08 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
77. OK...you choose. You want Socialized Medicine or not?
Smokers fund children's medical plans across the states. In Massachusetts, there wouldn't be any 'medical for all' without taxing smokers.

S...better think before you vote on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
80. I wonder if everyone will think it such a good idea -
- when they classify beer, wine and liquor as a drug? It's the next logical step and is only a matter of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #80
83. Alcohol is a drug..
One of the hardest drugs actually..

Going cold turkey on heroin will make you wish you would die.

Going cold turkey on alcohol can actually kill you.

http://www.alcohol-drug-rehab-directory.com/alcohol.html

Once DT's begin, there is no known medical treatment to stop them. Grand mal seizures, heart attacks and strokes can occur during the DT's, all of these serious alcohol withdrawal symptoms can be fatal to an alcoholic if not properly treated.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigmoon Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
81. Bush needs to veto this one
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigmoon Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
82. What aboutt he Bureau of Alcohol, TOBACCO and Firearms?
Are they going to regulate tobacco any more?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC