Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For Bush, Advances But Not Approval

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 03:21 PM
Original message
For Bush, Advances But Not Approval
Source: wpost



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/18/AR2007111801449_pf.html

For Bush, Advances But Not Approval

By Peter Baker
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, November 19, 2007; A01
...............

Bush, like other presidents, does better when he has a foil to play off of, whether an international enemy such as Osama bin Laden or Saddam Hussein, or a domestic political adversary such as Al Gore and Sen. John F. Kerry. Through much of 2005 and 2006, as he cratered politically, Bush had no particularly prominent rival to contrast with. But now he has the Democrats, who took over Congress in January and have provided him ammunition as their poll numbers fall.

...............

An us-vs.-them framework is comfortable for Bush. Some Republicans said he appears more spirited as he engages in a showdown over spending. "It's really a reinvigorated guy here," said Sen. Lindsey O. Graham, who traveled with Bush recently to his home state of South Carolina. "It's noticeable. Things just seem to be moving forward and hitting on all cylinders."

................

Key to his success has been keeping enough GOP lawmakers on his side to block Democratic initiatives, despite Republicans' lingering bitterness with Bush for not dumping Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld until the day after last year's election.
.......................

Bush's strategy contrasts with those of Clinton and Ronald Reagan, the last two-term presidents, who recovered from political troubles late in their tenures. Both found ways to work with an opposition Congress to pass important legislation. Reagan left office with a 64 percent approval rating and Clinton with a 65 percent rating........


Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/18/AR2007111801449_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Success" defined way, way downward
Is Bush getting his program advanced? Of course not. But the Post defines "success" in this instance as the ability to block Democratic initiatives. Gee whiz, that's gotta be every bit as tough as lifting two tons . . . 12 ounces at a time. Which I'm pretty sure Bush has also done in his miserable failure of a life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcsl1998 Donating Member (501 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Success = Lowest Voter Approval Rating of His Presidency?
Edited on Mon Nov-19-07 04:57 PM by rcsl1998
Yup - Very successful (just redefine 'success' - with a little help from the M$M)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Someday Bush will be on Rushmore.....
AHHHHHHHHHHH.... must be my cynasism....

But truth be told he is one hell of a strong lame Duck....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgervan Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Peter Baker
Another sheep repub in Washington Post's clothing. Anyone else notice how all of these newer, younger Post writers ( hired over the past year or two )seem to be conservative leaning, sympathetic to, and very forgiving of the Decider?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. The Post is just a republicon homelander propaganda organ
No cred, no honor.

How far they have fallen...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Isn't that the truth
Katherine Graham must be rolling over in her grave.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. like any accomplice, the Post can't help itself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC