Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: ‘Loyalty’ to Bush and Gonzales Was Factor in Prosecutors’ Firings, E-Mail Shows

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 10:12 AM
Original message
NYT: ‘Loyalty’ to Bush and Gonzales Was Factor in Prosecutors’ Firings, E-Mail Shows
‘Loyalty’ to Bush and Gonzales Was Factor in Prosecutors’ Firings, E-Mail Shows
By DAVID JOHNSTON and ERIC LIPTON
Published: March 14, 2007

....While the target list of prosecutors was shaped and shifted, officials at the Justice Department and the White House, members of Congress and even an important Republican lawyer and lobbyist in New Mexico were raising various concerns.

In rating the prosecutors, (D. Kyle Sampson, the chief of staff to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales) factored in whether they “exhibited loyalty to the president and attorney general,” according to documents released by the Justice Department. In one e-mail message, Mr. Sampson questioned a colleague about the record of the federal prosecutor in San Diego, Carol C. Lam. Referring to the office of the deputy attorney general, Mr. Sampson wrote: “Has ODAG ever called Carol Lam and woodshedded her re immigration enforcement? Has anyone?” Ms. Lam was one of the seven fired prosecutors....

***

The extensive consultations between the Justice Department and White House over which United States attorneys should be ousted started as early as March 2005, the e-mail messages show.

That is when Mr. Sampson, Mr. Gonzales’s aide, sent a document to Ms. Miers ranking the nation’s federal prosecutors.

“Bold=Recommend retaining; strong U.S. Attorneys who have produced, managed well, and exhibited loyalty to the president and attorney general,” the e-mail message from Mr. Sampson said. “Strikeout=Recommend removing; weak U.S. Attorneys who had been ineffectual managers and prosecutors, chafed against administration initiatives, etc.”...

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/14/washington/14justice.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nowhere does it say "loyalty to the constitution."
Oh, well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Too bad Bush hasn't gotten a blow job
He would be out of office by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kikosexy2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I'm sure Jeffy..
Gannon provided enough "lip-suction service" on the down-low...it's all hush-hush..on the QT....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. loyality in itself is not the problem--but the Bush type is dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Their loyalty should be to the LAW, not to the president
or a political party.

The expectations were obviously different here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. isn't party loyalty a job requirement in dictatorships? (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
6.  McClatchy: E-mail excerpts show interest in preserving new powers
McClatchy: E-mail excerpts show interest in preserving new powers
E-mail excerpts show interest in preserving new powers
By Margaret Talev
McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON - In a remarkably candid series of emails, Justice Department officials said its new powers to appoint interim U.S. attorneys without Senate confirmation offered the administration the chance to efficiently "get our preferred persons appointed" to the top prosecutors jobs.


Using the authority it quietly inserted into the USA Patriot Act that passed in March 2006, the officials discussed the prospected for a former operative for political adviser Karl Rove was appointed to the U.S. attorney's job in Arkansas, replacing one of eight suddenly fired by the administration.


"Our guy is in there so the status quo is good for us . . . note that he is qualified whenever asked, pledge to desire a Senate-confirmed U.S. attorney and otherwise hunker down," Kyle Sampson, former chief of staff to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, wrote in an e-mail in Dec. 19, 2006.


At the same time, Sampson wondered whether Rove aide Tim Griffin was "the guy on which to test drive this authority, but I know that getting him appointed was important to Harriet, Karl, etc.," Sampson wrote, referring to Harriet Miers, former White House Counsel and Karl Rove.

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/16897238.htm

I think this may be the root of all.....preserving power!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. So for Bush Admin, "loyalty" equates with accomplice or accessory, like
any other band of thugs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
19jet54 Donating Member (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 03:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'm am confused...
Edited on Thu Mar-15-07 03:33 AM by 19jet54
The Oath of Office and the Constitution

Oath
I, (your name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

5 U.S.C. §3331
http://www.opm.gov/constitution_initiative/oath.asp

So now, "‘Loyalty’ to Bush and Gonzales Was Factor in Prosecutors’ Firings" overides this Federal Law????

I'm am confused... :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I think you leave off the "So help me God" part, but .......yeah.
That's the one I took when I enlisted in the MC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Direct Links to Emails released
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 12:48 PM by LiberalFighter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC