Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Turkey Refuses U.S. Request To Allow Attack On Iran From Turkish Base

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 06:39 PM
Original message
Turkey Refuses U.S. Request To Allow Attack On Iran From Turkish Base
04/30/06 "YNetNews" -- -- Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul said Sunday that his country refused a request from the United States to attack Iran from its Air Force base in Incirlik, despite the U.S. offer of a nuclear reactor, according to a report in Al Biyan.

http://informationclearinghouse.info/article12887.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now that's some irony.
We'll give you a nuclear reactor if you help us bomb their reactor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm glad...thank you Turkey! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. You should be worry
You should be holding your sons and daughters you neice and nephew and hope the mad chimp get stop.

You should be looking at the HUGE troop build up by Turkey at Iraq border.
You should be asking why Saudi need China to sign defence pact.
You should look at all the arms deal Russia signing with Iran
You should be worry why arms flowing in without stop.

You should be worry stiff at the huge silence from so many countries and only China Russia talking.
You should be looking at what Pakistan saying
What India saying

You know what the rest of world saying on this issue. The people on the street
"FUCK US."
Do you want to wait until he attack then do something
Can you control events after he does
Can you retreat
Can you save all those lifes in Iraq
Can you stop your embassies being destroy worldwide
Can you blame the world when Americans in other countries get attack or killed
Can you say
WE ALL GONE FRIGGING NUTS.
:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Turkey and Iran share a common enemy the Kurds.
A Kurdish nation with oil is one of Turkey's worst nightmares. Iran and Turkey have basic understandings in regards to the Kurds. You are right the world has gone crazy, it will get worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why does the US need to launch attacks from Turkey?
Don't we have a lot of fucking ships in the persian gulf?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Perhaps the Navy is not as agreeable to following illegal orders?
There seem to be more fundie religious influence in the Air Force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. very true
The only thing that will stop an Iran attack now is a full out military revolt. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. Sunburn missile
Ships are like BIG IRON COFFINS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. We used it as a drone
Rense is not a good source of info. We used it as a TARGET drone..

This platform, its telemetry and motor were a joint project between us defense companies and a russian company.

This source is dubious, there is no need to use anything in turkey. F-117 and b2's have the range to operate from other countries.

Smelly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. Haha
go on and find out then haha :rofl:

Guess you talking about them as anti air missile :rofl:

Damn they are not anti air but anti ship missile

The anti air system is another different one all together :rofl:

Of course Sunburn missile not good for air.

Of course bombing Iran is simple
After that bye bye US :rofl:
A stupid person is a real thing >
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmakaze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #35
44. You did?
I bet the Russians would be glad to know that one of their most high tech antiship missiles, the SS-N-22 ‘Sunburn’ as NATO calls it, was nothing more than a target drone and was built by US companies.

Or maybe you are just full of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mallard Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. Re: "Why does the US need to launch attacks from Turkey?"
Could it be: that would bring Turkey into a new war in repsonse to counter-attacks against them?

Pretty good value when you think about it: bribe some dumb Muslims and get them to fight your wars for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
46. Two reasons:
Tactical: shorter distances means faster rotations and response-time.
Strategic: destabilize Turkey and Europe is dead in the water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. well then -- in bushco world -- bomb them too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Um...When did we decide to attack Iran?
Must have missed the decision amidst all the denials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Iran Freedom Act
Pass last week in Congress by 327-21
HR 282 I think.

Undeclared war started.
Only way to call a legalise REGIME CHANGE oversee by a mad chimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. So now the US will hand out Nuclear Reactors for favors...
the world is in trouble....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. We wanted to do it with Iran when the Shah was in power
It was none other than Cheney who wanted to help the Shah get nuclear power so they would stop using their fossil fuels for domestic power and put it all on the market.

http://www.abc.net.au/rn/rearvision/stories/2006/1586988.htm

The above link is a very good ABC Radio National (Australia) podcast on this history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Thanks for the link...
Funny how Cheney's name keep popping up!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Then we can turn around and bomb them for having a nuclear program n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mallard Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Re: what results do they claim to expect time ...
...and what results do they actually want?

The economic crunch resulting from $100/barrel oil is one major factor in the general response to the expansion of regional US-initiated war.

Because people will be demonstrating against many of their governemnts over undue hardship, a new age of authoritarian rule is what results for much of the world.

Thanks alot Mr 'Bring em on"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh Gawd Colbert was great on 60 minutes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wild speculation and fantasy land, that's crazy talk from the Turks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Take your damn head
out of bush ass. :puke:

Who is crazy Turkey or you :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. The Turks Turned us down when we wanted to invade Iraq from
Edited on Sun Apr-30-06 07:59 PM by alfredo
their bases. It's called being consistent.


On edit: I am no fan of the Turks. My family is Armenian. I have no love for the Turks but I do have to agree with them on this. Nothing good can come from helping bush. It could open them up for more terrorism and possibly war crimes charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
34.  Wolfowitz in 2003 scolded the Turkish military for not overriding ..
.. the civilian government's refusal to let us launch Operation Iraqi Liberation from Turkey:


Wolfowitz Scolds Turks Over Failure To Back U.S.
Associated Press
Wednesday, May 7, 2003; Page A20
... He told private television CNN-Turk that he was particularly disappointed with the Turkish military. "I think for whatever reason, they did not play the strong leadership role . . . that we would have expected," he said in the interview, conducted Monday in Washington ... http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A22884-2003May6?language=printer

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. So if our military turns on bush, Wolfowitz will have no
room to complain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #34
41. Live by the coup, die by the coup, Rummie.
"I think for whatever reason, they did not play the strong leadership role . . . that we would have expected," That could have been said about the U.S. military brass before the Iraq invasion. They're not going to be fooled again, Don.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. We can only be thankful there are SOME straight thinking leaders
in the World, since OURS is completely NUTS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Change Iran to Iraq and it is 2003 all over again
Same headlines just one little letter of the alphabet is changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yeah
And they massing troops on Iraq border

Line in Sand or Iran
Does your monkey understand what he is trying to do

Does the media curtain protect him from news of all the deals happening worldwide
Does he not understand what Defence pact between China Saudi means

I think he does hence he expanding WAR on Terror beyond the countries involve
Oh yeah dumb monkey sending elites US force to US embassy to protect them :rofl:
What happen when mob turn ugly cause of mad monkey action
Yeah people get kill but me think special force will come home in casket and embassy burn to ground.
You really think those elite can save the embassy or stop hoards of angry people when you attack Iran bush.... YOU DAMN DUMB. The minute you kill one of the mob you sign death warrant for every single one in embassy.

What make you have such a HARD ON for IRAN. I dont know. But know this even if you draft the entire 290 million American YOU STILL LOSE. Sigh the entire world will turn HOSTILE on you. What a damn FUCK UP leader. What a damn FUCK UP country who willing walk the path to war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. So let me get this straight...
Edited on Sun Apr-30-06 07:52 PM by Canuckistanian
Shrub wants to prevent a country from building nuclear weapons and nuclear reactors by dropping a nuclear weapon on them.

And he wants to bribe another country to help him by giving them a nuclear reactor (that they could use to build their own nuclear weapons).

Sounds like a sound policy to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. It gets worse when you consider Iran and Iraq both fear a common enemy.
"The Kurds" One of those little disputes well under the radar ignored by *. They even cooperate in fighting Kurdish factions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Yes, you're right
The Kurds ARE going to be a political force in the future. If "Kurdistan" happens, there will be a third dynamic in the area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Sorry I meant to say Turkey and Iran cooperate.
Of course Iraq is in Civil War which gives new meaning to asymmetrical warfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. No, you're right
Iraq, Iran, Syria and Turkey all have Kurdish regions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. I'm not sure I believe this story...
Oh, I'm sure Mr. Gul is being sincere. I have no doubt that's what the US asked him.

It's just that it's a set-up by the US. The US is putting on a big show of attacking Iran.

The fact is: the US doesn't need Turkey to do attack Iran. The US already has aircraft carriers in the straits of Hormuz. It has plenty of bases closer to Iran. We already have troops right next door: in Iraq.

And think about it: Turkey is a muslim nation. Iran is muslim. Does anybody believe they would shut up if the US told them they were going to bomb a country they have good relations with?????

Besides, the US is not the only country that can offer them a nuclear reactor. Russia has been setting up the one in Iran. This story is bogus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. By god I believe you are right
Just a propaganda campaign to put pressure on Iran and to molify the war hawks in their base.

Good call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. I didn't figure this out on my own -
believe me, I was every bit as nervous as everybody else when Washington started beating the war drums about 1 month ago.

But I recently read this article on From the Wilderness. Stan Goff explains why the US CANNOT bomb Iran.

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/012706_bombing_iran.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Thanks. Goff presents a good case.
also

"A stupid person is a real thing"


Have to remember that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
37. If we've stationed carriers in the Straits of Hormuz, we can kiss....
...them goodbye. No U. S. Navy commanding officer would place his surface command at risk by having them sail into such restricted waters.

IMHO, and if we're smart, the only naval assets we will sail through the Straits into the Persian Gulf to conduct operations against Iran will be nuclear subs carrying cruise missiles.

No surface navy assets will be permitted to sail into the Persian Gulf until all potential missile threats along the Iranian coast and a couple of hundred miles inland are neutralized.

All of the above is assuming that the NeoCon operation against Iran is cast in stone, and unfortunately, I have no reason to believe otherwise.

Then again, I may be assuming that an attack against Iran would be in a conventional form, and that may not be the case at all. We've already heard His Chimpness spout off about having the right to use nuclear weapons in a preemptive strike, so that kind of attack cannot be ruled out.

The madness just continues to grow, doesn't it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
33. MEEP
ok, hypocrisy and lunacy aside, this pretty much blows out of the water bush's claims of 'we want a diplomatic solution', not that its really a big surprise. bush let slip their true intentions months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-30-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
40. History repeats itself!
Correct me if I am wrong, and I've not yet read through the replies to this thread, but didn't Turkey also refuse to play this role once before with Iraq? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
42. That kinda tells ya America is going to get ready to bomb Iran
WWIII is coming Americans :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. The Bush Administration wants us to think war with Iran is coming, but
Edited on Mon May-01-06 06:31 AM by leveymg
they can't actually execute it. Bushco's in no position to force the military to start a war in Iran that up and down the ranks the troops and intelligence officers know we can not win militarily and politically, in the same way we can't "win" in Iraq.

This is an elaborate pyswar campaign, and it is largely a partisan political one directed at the American people to get us into an hysterical war fever that the White House hopes will help the GOP in November. And, by those terms, the campaign is working.

We should not play into their game by proclaiming that the end of the world is nigh. That's just a role that's been programmed for the Left in this high-stakes political game.

I believe the best thing to do is to say this is BS. Say it loudly, and often, and maybe, maybe, the American people will see this for what it is: the crudest form of power politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Interesting. Despite the track record of the NeoCon Junta, you....
...want us to think this story about Turkey is BS?

Do you seriously believe the NeoCons are playing a game?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. Problem is; we've said that about everything Bush has done.
He doesn't have the power or authority...oh wait he does, well shit. Bush has more unitary power than any other president in our history. NO president has ever declared HUNDREDS of laws inapplicable to his administration. NO president has ever outed a secret agent in an act of revenge against their husband. NO president has ever enjoyed the total power of the patriot act one and two, war powers act, the level of a federal program/agency to spying on fellow Americans. Secret torture chambers and prisons in other countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
47. Here's a nuke plant, now let us invade your neighbor.
Wow, what a fair deal... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. This administration is the best Mafia ever!
Should Turkey be afraid? I dunno...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC