Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: Cheney disclosure may be a defense for indicted aide

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:48 AM
Original message
AP: Cheney disclosure may be a defense for indicted aide
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 02:49 AM by PhilipShore
The Associated Press
Cheney disclosure may be a defense for indicted aide
02.16.2006

http://www.azstarnet.com/allheadlines/116137

WASHINGTON — Vice President Dick Cheney disclosed Wednesday that he has the power to declassify sensitive government information, authority that could set up a criminal defense for his former chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby.

When Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald revealed Libby's assertions to a grand jury that he had been authorized by his superiors to spread sensitive information, the prosecutor did not specify which superiors.

But in an interview on Fox News Channel, Cheney said there is an executive order that gives the vice president, along with the president, the authority to declassify information.

"I have certainly advocated declassification. I have participated in declassification decisions," Cheney said. Asked for details, he said, "I don't want to get into that. There's an executive order that specifies who has classification authority, and obviously it focuses first and foremost on the president, but also includes the vice president."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Panda1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. They're a bunch of lying CROOKS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. Good work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. That Cheney is a bit off his game ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. So now the White House writes the law. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
28. If he was de-classifying the information
then why was there a need to "leak" it?

And why not state this from the outset? Why not come out and say this from the very beginning instead of keeping this a big secret until it was dug up by some special prosecutor?

When will the lies end?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nancy Waterman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #28
36. There must be a procedure for declassifying
So where is the paperwork where he said that Valerie Plame's name was no longer classifed? And were is the paperwork on those NIE's that he supposedly declassified. Having a subordiinate call reporters is not "declassifying" information. This is totally BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. He shot a man; it was the worst moment in his life; yet he's
setting rules and precedent, and rules of declassification, and all kinds of stuff that he should be too broke up to deal with?
WHY WASN'T THE GUY IN TX, W/THE GUY HE SHOT?
He ain't that important!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Cheney is lying...as usual. I can't find the Exec. Order can you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Executive Order 12356, issued April 2, 1982 (Was that Reagan era?)
I am not a lawyer, but I don't think that the Scooter Libby Indictments -- will ever go to Trial because the CIA and/or related information has immunity.

My own opinion is that the Fitz Hearings are just lip service, with the MSM saying—an extensive investigation is being done by Fitz, and he found no wrong, thus paving the way for Jeb to run in 2008.

Did Reagan create this executive order, allowing them to declassify data?

_____________________________



Executive Order 12356, issued April 2, 1982, removed any specific time requirements for declassification. Instead, it provides that information shall be declassified or downgraded as soon as national security considerations permit. Declassification of classified U.S. government originated information less than 30 years old is the responsibility of the originating agency and declassification of foreign government information provided to the U.S. in confidence which is less than 30 years old is the responsibility of the agency initially receiving or classifying the information. Systematic review of classified U.S. government originated information and foreign government information provided in confidence which is more than 30 years old is the responsibility of the National Archives and Records Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 05:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. 1982 - Reagan Era
Agree - as usual, these thugs will try to get away with anything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. My reading of that doesn't give Cheney
the right to declassify dick. "Declassification ... is the responsibility of the originating agency".

Duck Cheney is not the 'originating agency' of Plame's covert status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. It seems pretty clear, you are right
only the original source can declassify it. At least from that part of the EO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. I totally agree--Dickiebird not the "originating agency"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #14
35. National Review: The Little-Noticed Order That Gave Dick Cheney New Power
National Review
The Little-Noticed Order That Gave Dick Cheney New Power
Have you ever heard of Executive Order 13292?
February 16, 2006

http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200602160841.asp

In addition to discussing his hunting accident, Vice President Dick Cheney, in his interview on the Fox News Channel Wednesday, also pointed to a little-known but enormously consequential expansion of vice-presidential power that has come about as a result of the Bush administration's war on terror.

Cheney was referring to Executive Order 13292, issued by President Bush on March 25, 2003, which dealt with the handling of classified material. That order was not an entirely new document but was, instead, an amendment to an earlier Executive Order, number 12958, issued by President Bill Clinton on April 17, 1995.

At the time, Bush's order received very little coverage in the press. What mention there was focused on the order's provisions making it easier for the government to keep classified documents under wraps. But as Cheney pointed out Wednesday, the Bush order also contained a number of provisions which significantly increased the vice president's power.

Throughout Executive Order 13292, there are changes to the original Clinton order which, in effect, give the vice president the power of the president in dealing with classified material. In the original Clinton executive order, for example, there appeared the following passage:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. This does not say the vice President or the President can declassify.
It says the originating agency must declassify. Did the CIA declassify Plame's status? I think not. If they had they would not have called for an investigation. In addition, Fitzgerald himself said that Plame's identity was classified at the time it was leaked. I doubt Fitzgerald would have made a mistake like that, as careful as he is.

And in addition, if Cheney knew he had declassified Plame's identity, why didn't he say so from the beginning and stopped Fitzgerald's investigation cold? I think Cheney is twisting the facts, commonly called lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murpheeslaw Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. Still maybe hoisted on that there petard . . .
Sec. 5.3. Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel.
(a) Establishment and administration.

(1) There is established an Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel. The Departments of State, Defense, and Justice, the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Archives, and the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs shall each be represented by a senior-level representative who is a full-time or permanent part-time Federal officer or employee designated to serve as a member of the Panel by the respective agency head.

. . .

(e) The Panel is established for the sole purpose of advising and assisting the President in the discharge of his constitutional and discretionary authority to protect the national security of the United States. Panel decisions are committed to the discretion of the Panel, unless changed by the President.

(f) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) through (e) of this section, whenever the Panel reaches a conclusion that information owned or controlled by the Director of Central Intelligence (Director) should be declassified, and the Director notifies the Panel that he objects to its conclusion because he has determined that the information could reasonably be expected to cause damage to the national security and to reveal (1) the identity of a human intelligence source, or (2) information about the application of an intelligence source or method (including any information that concerns, or is provided as a result of, a relationship with a cooperating intelligence element of a foreign government), the information shall remain classified unless the Director's determination is appealed to the President, and the President reverses the determination.

So did he ASK if it would be alright to out her?

If he did and the Panel said NO did the President reverse the determination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #21
34. National Review: Exec. Order 13292 Gives the VP the power of the president
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 11:25 AM by PhilipShore
I am not a lawyer; a FOIA lawyer might know the actual answer.

Executive Order 13292
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13292

Executive Order 13292 concerns classified national security information of the United States government and "prescribes a uniform system for classifying, safeguarding, and declassifying national security information, including information relating to defense against transnational terrorism." It was issued by President George W. Bush on March 25, 2003 and amends earlier executive orders on classified information, including Executive Order 12356 of April 6, 1982 and Executive Order 12958 of October 14, 1995.

The significance of this executive order was a subject that Vice President Dick Cheney discussed in a February 15, 2006 interview that was mostly focused on the hunting incident which had occurred a few days earlier. That interview included a few questions on a comment by Scooter Libby related to the Plame affair; one of those questions led to the following comment from Cheney:

There is an executive order that specifies who has classification authority, and obviously focuses first and foremost on the President, but also includes the Vice President...

Byron York of the National Review noted some of the changes that Cheney was referring to...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. this is more likely the Exe. order


Declassification of classified material.

http://www.fas.org/sgp/bush/eoamend.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. I don't believe he was indicted for disclosing
classified info (though I think he should have been). Perjury was the charge. This is no defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. bingo
unless the claim is that cheney also simultaneously made classified the fact that Libby was part of a leak campaign, in which case (which would never fly btw as I am being sarcastic) maybe it wasn't perjury because the leak campaign was conveniently classified by Cheney :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. Rule by vp fiat has replaced rule of law. Not surprizing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Military fiat?
I am not a lawyer; but I think the Gonzo hearings (about Wiretapping/National Security law) gives defacto military fiat rights to the PNAC (Bush and Co.) administration to do anything it wants, regardless of rule of law -- as long as it says it involves National Security and the military-industrial-complex.

____________________________________

Talk:Military fiat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Military_fiat

Military fiat is a process whereby a decision is made and enforced by military means without the participation of other political elements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #12
33. sounds about right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. If the information was declassified by executive order,
Then Cheney lied when told Fitzgerald that his office did not reveal Valery Plame's identity. That's obstruction of justice.

His only possible defense for lying would have been that he was protecting classified information. Now he has thrown that defense away.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
outhouse Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
27. If Cheney had this authority
Then why did the President say that he would dismiss anyone on his staff that leaked this information. Kind of puts that defense to rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
15. But as this Ray says--Libby not charged with leaking classified informatio


Libby is not charged with leaking classified information, and Libby's lawyers said last week there was no truth to a published report that Libby's lawyers had advised the court or prosecutors that he will raise a defense based on authorization by superiors.

Former Whitewater independent counsel Robert Ray said Libby could point to authorization from his superiors as part of his strategy at trial.

"If it turns out that Cheney was actively involved in decisions related to the disclosure of a CIA officer's identity and if the truth of it is that he was orchestrating the disclosure of information to the media, it seems to me that's a fundamentally different case than one centered around the activities of Libby," said Ray.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
17. More of the..
... "we can do anything we want" defense. Good luck with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VirginiaDem Donating Member (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
18. Assuming that Cheney had this power wouldn't he
have to officially declassify it. You know, get it in writing? Anyone wanna bet that it's not in writing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. right, I'll wager there's nothing official re: declassification; it's just
Cheney issuing a proclamation or digging thru files himself to get info
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
22. Does this power extend to telling aides to lie to the Grand Jury?
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 09:08 AM by Jim__
My best recollection is that Libby was charged with lying to the FBI and the Grand Jury.I'm not sure how Cheney's authority vis-a-vis government classification helps Libby with these charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
23. Chris Matthews said last night it's news to him that VP has this authority
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
26. Fitzgerald said during his press conference
that Plame's identity was classified at the time of the leak. Fitzgerald maybe a lot of things but he is certainly very careful about what he says. He in no way implied that Plame's identity had been declassified before the leak. If Cheney knew all along that Plame's identity was declassified, why didn't he tell Fitz and stop the investigation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. I imagine there are formal procedures if this is even legal
And I doubt highly that Cheney took those steps. And if he did, I doubt he can legitimize them under the terms of the act. All this does is implicate Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
31. The AP has it wrong--as usual
Libby is not charged with outing the agent. He's charged with perjury. Whether or not Cheney is/was/may some day be able to declassify info is irrelevant to Libby's current case.

Cheney is not floating forward a defense for Libby. He is floating forward a defense for himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
32. Assuming Cheney had an authority to declassify certain documents, this
authority definitely would not include the power to out an active CIA agent. Therefore, I fail to understand Cheney floating this defense unless he is still upset over shooting someone. Five draft
deferments kept his scared ass out of Vietnam, but he can shoot fat quails with clipped wings. What a man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
37. when did monkey boy sign that order?
I somehow think that order must have been signed by chimpy himself (probably last week) to cover their tracks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC