Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Saddam and defence team boycott trial

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 07:20 AM
Original message
Saddam and defence team boycott trial
Saddam Hussein and four co-accused refused to attend their trial on Wednesday, along with their defence team, who said they would not return to court until the chief judge they accuse of bias resigns. Chief judge Raouf Abdel Rahman said he would proceed without them and court-appointed lawyers replaced Saddam's team.

The boycott by Saddam, his former aides and the defence team threw the trial into further confusion.
Speaking earlier to Reuters in the Jordanian capital Amman, Saddam's chief lawyer Khalil al-Dulaimi accused Abdel Rahman, a member of the Kurdish community long oppressed by Saddam, of showing bias and rushing to hand down a sentence.

"We cannot attend any trial session unless the chief judge resigns, because he holds a personal grudge against my client," he said. Abdel Rahman, who has infuriated Saddam and his defence team with his no-nonsense style, is trying to take control of a trial been marred by delays since getting under way last October. Two members of the defence team have been murdered, chief judge Rizgar Amin resigned complaining of political interference, and his original replacement was shifted aside after being accused of belonging to Saddam's Baath party.

Abdel Rahman, who stares out Saddam and yells back at him, has made it clear he will not tolerate the former leader's outbursts. The trial has turned into a test of wills since he began presiding over proceedings on Sunday. "After what happened ... the defence team was confronted with only one choice -- the boycott of a court that has no legitimacy, (is) unconstitutional and has already taken a prior decision to convict the president," Dulaimi said.

http://www.swissinfo.org/sen/swissinfo.html?siteSect=143&sid=6430608&cKey=1138794621000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. This belongs in the Hague.for just this reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC