Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Idaho Supreme Court hears appeal of Ten Commandments initiative

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Thom Little Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 03:53 PM
Original message
Idaho Supreme Court hears appeal of Ten Commandments initiative
If citizens are allowed to vote on whether a Ten Commandments monument should be returned to a city park, then all administrative decisions by local governments - from replacing playground equipment to pruning park trees - could be subject to voter reversal, the Idaho Supreme Court was told Friday.

"This case won't just stand for this monument, it won't just stand for the Ten Commandments," said Valencia Bilyeu, who argued on behalf of the city of Boise to uphold a lower court ruling rejecting the voter initiative petitions by a group known as Keep the Commandments Coalition. "This case will stand for administrative decisions across the state."

Coalition members gathered more than 18,000 signatures in support of putting to a public vote the March 2004 decision by the Boise City Council to relocate a 40-year-old monument inscribed with the Biblical commandments from the city's Julia Davis Park to private property at an Episcopal church. But city officials refused to include the initiative on the November 2004 ballot, arguing that administrative decisions do not qualify as legislative actions subject to reversal through the initiative process. The coalition sued, and 4th District Judge Ronald Wilper sided with the city in October last year. The coalition appealed, asking the Idaho Supreme Court to overturn the decision and allow the monument removal to be put to a vote.

Coalition attorney Christ Troupis told the court that the city's action qualified as legislative because the council had workers remove the monument without consulting the city's administrative body for regulating park monuments, the city parks commission. And, Troupis said, the city's stated reason for the removal was clearly a policy decision: To avoid a lawsuit from an anti-homosexual preacher who wanted a monument of his own placed in the park.


http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/ID_TEN_COMMANDMENTS_IDOL-?SITE=VARIT&SECTION=US&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2005-12-09-16-54-26
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. I actually wouldn't mind public displays ...
... of the Ten Commandments -- as long as they were flanked by giant signs describing all of the Commandments BUSH has broken, to whit:

"Thou shalt not LIE ... (lead-up to war statements)

"Thou shalt not STEAL ... (tax cuts for wealthy at expense of poor)

"Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour ...
(The Swiftboat ads, etc.)

"Thou shalt not KILL ... (casualties in Iraq, torture)

"Thou shalt not worship other 'gods' before Me ... (love of power and the Almighty Buck)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Coalition attorney Christ Troupis" look, christ HAS returned.... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dunvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-05 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. So this is what the...
Edited on Sat Dec-10-05 04:27 PM by Dunvegan
"Christ Troup-is" up to these days, eh? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC