You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: Interesting. And sadly plausible. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Interesting. And sadly plausible.
Some companies are happy to use long-term temps to keep from paying benefits, even though the temp agency gets as much as half of the money the company pays to the temp agency. I understand that Microsoft was infamous for hiring temps, long term temps especially, for years. Don't know if they still do.

I'm under the vague impression that there are actually laws in effect that are intended to reduce the long-term temp thing, but aren't generally enforced. And I might well be wrong, and that there are no such laws.

I do know that laws about independent contractors are enforceable, but that's not what you're talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC