You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Foreclosuregate: Time To Put A Fork In MERS? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 09:34 PM
Original message
Foreclosuregate: Time To Put A Fork In MERS?
Advertisements [?]


2011-02-13 12:38
Karl Denninger
in Foreclosuregate

Time To Put A Fork In MERS?


I was wondering how long this would take.... it appears that all the crooners that have appeared in front of Congress and elsewhere have finally had their heads cut off by.... as I expected..... a bankruptcy Judge.

Bankruptcy Judges are federal judges. The Federal bench tends to have a very low tolerance for bullcrap, although they do get bamboozled and fall prey to political arguments from time to time, like any body composed of humans. Nonetheless if you want to find justice, you usually will have a better shot at it in a Federal courtroom than in a State one. This means that if you're trying to play a game, you want to be in State court - but if you're looking for facts and logical analysis, you want to be in Federal court.

The case at bar here is one in which the debtor actually lost his motion to debar the creditor from lifting a bankruptcy stay. How, you might ask, can MERS get cornholed from a win? Simple: The debtor lost not on the merits but on res judicata, the legal principle that says "what's decided is decided." In this case (if I'm reading this correctly; I don't have the entire case history) the foreclosure hearing was held and decided before the debtor filed bankruptcy.

But the judge was obviously ****ed off and tired of the games. He could have issued a one-page order saying "go away." He didn't. Instead, he analyzed the entire MERS edifice and found that it does not comply with NY State Property Law.

Oops.



read the rest: http://market-ticker.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC