You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: Why wouldn't we? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Literate Dragon Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Why wouldn't we?
Remember, this would not be a "Tea Party convention," it would represent a broad spectrum of the American people. Also, bear in mind once more that anything proposed by the convention would have to be ratified by the states. Do you really think that 3/4 of the states would approve an amendment abolishing separation of church and state? I certainly don't!

Mind you, the amendment we really need is indeed to the First Amendment, but it has nothing to do with the establishment of religion or free-exercise clause thereof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC