You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: What is most troubling to me is that those targeted for "kill not capture", along with waterboarded [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. What is most troubling to me is that those targeted for "kill not capture", along with waterboarded
Edited on Fri May-13-11 08:18 AM by leveymg
"high value" detainees are those who knew the most about AQ's support network and global patrons. It seems obvious that if the real object of these operations was to shut down the financial and support network that makes terrorist operations possible, the US would go out of its way to capture alive for interrogation those who know the most about these details.

Managers of the program would also make damn sure that the methods used to capture and interrogate such detainees did not damage their ability to accurately recall details. Under this criteria, waterboarding (partial drowning which kills brain cells) is obviously out, as is prolonged sleep deprivation (which can also result in memory impairment). Yet, the approach actually taken to these major AQ figures has been the one that quite predictably yields the least accurate information or destroys the evidence. See, http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/09/22/785150/-AP:-CIA-Torture-Damaged-Brains,-Recall-of-9-11-Suspects

It's not like I'm the only one who has said this about the efficacy of certain types of "enhanced interrogation techniques." The FBI also objected to waterboarding and psychological torture of AQ detainees for the same reason.

The unanswered question is: why kill the most important witnesses and destroy the evidence, when there is a choice? See, http://journals.democraticunderground.com/leveymg/334

As for al-Awlaki, he has had the most remarkable history of being the hub or connecting spoke in the wheels of AQ operations and miraculously being subsequently let go by the authorities or sidestepping the bullet. He's facilitated more actual and attempted terrorist attacks on American targets than anyone else, going back to his role as "spiritual advisor" for the Flt. 77 hijackers, overseeing them in San Diego and then traveling cross-country to join them in the DC area in the months before 9/11. He's like a lightening rod for terrorists - they always manage to find him, and vis-a-versa. Given his apparent usefulness, I am not surprised that he continually gets "thrown back" and escapes attempts to kill him. Please, see, related, http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/02/02/940661/-Wikileaks-reveals-9-11-Team-Bhijack-team-got-away
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC