Reply #41: Let's be clear, it doesn't save them money.

[joshcryer]

They profit because this woman now has to pay restitution. Was the child educated even though the woman was not legally in that district? Yes? Was the education paid for by the rate payers in that district? Yes? Then there was no money 'lost.'

:puke:

(PS I'm not upset with you, I'm upset with the situation at large, in fact don't consider my post directed at you, it's just a follow up to what you were writing.)