You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #215: confidental statements from japan implying complete core melt of U2 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
divvy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
215. confidental statements from japan implying complete core melt of U2
There are statements coming out of Japan implying that a complete core melt of U2 has probably occurred and it may have breeched the reactor. It is my understanding that these Japanese plants were not built with a core catcher below the reactor. My plant had this large casting below the vessel. You can find out more by Googling "nuclear core catcher" and reading the Wikipedia writeup. Since the drywell on these plants is steel, not concrete... a breech of the reactor vessel will make short work of the drywell. The core is now setting on the Reactor building basement and foundation, if it really breeched the vessel. Pouring water onto it or into the vessel would leech and spill on the site. I am not sure how effective the water is now in cooling the core once it has left the vessel and perhaps they should consider not adding water to U2. It may be doing more harm (in spreading radioactive water) than good (in cooling the core material). The danger now is that dose rates and contamination levels will get so bad that it becomes impossible to maintain the fight to save the other plants. They need to quickly figure out how to do more onsite with less human involvement. It isn't looking good that this disaster is going to be brought under control. The government should be looking at contingency plans for increasing the evacuation zone. I wonder about the remaining population that is north of the nuclear plant site. Can they be cutoff from a good evacuation route? Should vulnerable old people and the sick be moved now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC