You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: Good response list [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
divvy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
23. Good response list
Here are things that a good response to the crisis would have. I am not saying it is or isn't happening. I don't know. 1) there should be 6 response teams, not one team for 6 plants... 2) there should be an army of engineers brainstorming to support the operators onsite... 3) the teams should have a plan and timeline for restoring each plant to a safe shutdown condition... 4) the plant designers such as GE and/or Toshiba should have been asked or paid to form an emergency response team and provide advice... 5) each system at the plant should be reviewed to determine whether or not it is needed to safely operate the plant to safe shutdown (the fuel pool fire problem should have been anticipated and prevented) and a plan in place to restore it, if necessary.... 6) work crews from these and unstricken plants should be cycled through this site to prevent lethal exposures... 7) this site will not be normal until AC power is restored... There should be bulldozers and whatever is needed working on just that! Airlift generators... Put up a transmission line... Whatever... More power! I wish I could see more of these things being done. Maybe it is, but I am not hearing them talk about it. I am also not seeing the response to an uncovered core that I was trained to do. I don't know if what they are doing is better, or not. Maybe here is a good reason for he discrepancy. It wasn't what I was taught and that concerns me... If they can keep the core covered, fine... but if not, I don't know. These hydrogen explosions are a bad sign that the fuel is in bad shape now. Each explosion is a risk of damage to remaining safety equipment and barriers. Just some random thoughts... 40 Rem/hr? If memory serves me, 300 Rem is potentially lethal. 200 Rem and you may have radiation sickness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC