You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #99: Because historically it always has. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Atypical Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #89
99. Because historically it always has.
>Why does this HAVE to balance out - in order to give the bosses a reason to cut everyone's pay?

Historically, as areas have developed, wages and standards of living have increased. As people get better things in life they demand more and more better things in life, as do their neighbors.

It happened here in the Southern US. Jobs flooded in from the North to take advantage of the cheaper labor, and consequently the standard of living and wages in the South (and all over the US) rose to comparable levels.

Employers can't just arbitrarily cut pay. There is a point at which people won't do the work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC