You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #29: As I read it he has several objections... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
sweetloukillbot Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-10-11 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
29. As I read it he has several objections...
1) Congress setting stipulations on how the military can treat terror suspects.
2) The provision to turn civilian terror suspects over to the military.
3) Restrictions on how the military can release detainees from Guantanamo.
4) Restrictions on how the military can transfer detainees to prison in the US.

Why the fuck is everyone blaming the president?
Seems like Levin got all hawkish because of the underwear bomber who was arrested and Miranda'd before the military could interrogate him. (Remember the right wing going crazy over that?) So he wrote this piece of shit legislation to avoid that happening again.
And ever since I heard about this all I've heard is that Obama will veto because of this provision. Now the "black is white" newspeak people are trying to insist that despite him saying he's going to veto it, he's actually secretly planning to install it. Whatever. That's like the idiots on the right who bitch about the socialist health care program that requires people to buy insurance from private companies.

Frankly, the people I've heard bitching about this the most are crazy right-wing gun nuts who are jerking off waiting for the revolution and are terrified they'll be branded terrorists and shipped to FEMA camps via the NAFTA superhighway.
And since I know how stupid they are, I'll give the president the benefit of the doubt when he says he's going to veto the legislation.

Honestly I think the whole thing is political theater - the Dems vote to pass it so they seem strong on defense and fighting terror in an election year, then don't vote to override the veto - it's bullshit gamesmanship, but it prevents attack ads in 8 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC