You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #138: +1. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
wickerwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-11-11 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #28
138. +1.
Although in all probability we would have never heard about it at all since sexual abuse of girls is so commonplace it rarely makes the news unless it's a *very* young girl or there's some other hook (like cult activity, gang rape, a serial killer, or a really famous guy involved).

1 in 3 girls is molested before age 18- twice as many as the number of boys. Sexual abuse only really hits the news big when it involves boys and when it involves a cover-up by an institution like the Church, Boy Scouts, etc.

Boys being abused *is* considered news because it is comparatively rare and because it is more of a taboo/cultural violation for a man to rape a boy than for a man to rape a girl. Up until the last 200 years, a sixty year old raping an 11 year old was called "the wedding night".

In the 40s Errol Flynn was busted repeatedly with underaged girls and it just fed his reputation as a "lady's man". Jerry Lee Lewis still had a career after marrying a 13 year old. If Flynn had been accused of statutory rape involving underage boys, do you think Bill Buckley would have founded a defense society for him and he would have been acquitted? Would Jerry Lee Lewis still have had a career if he'd wanted to marry a 13 year old boy? How many rock stars have slept with fourteen or fifteen year old groupies and nobody bats an eyelid.

The sad fact is that in the US desiring "barely legal" girls is perfectly normal and understandable for any red-blooded American man, while desiring underage boys makes you a despicable pervert who should be shot in the street.

To answer the OP: yes, it would have been news because it was a 10 year old and a famous person and an institution covered it up. Certainly not because it was a girl and not a boy.

People turn a blind eye to sexual abuse of girls all the time. It's practically a cliche that step-dad diddles step-daughter and she tries to tell mom who either doesn't believe her because she wants to keep the man or blames the daughter because she's jealous and thinks the daughter is trying to steal him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC