Reply #231: The documentary *is* thought-provoking, and I do plug it to all my friends, BUT the OP is more about

[shcrane71]

the "what's the diff" question between the social commentary made in that film, and the social commentary that primarily women feminist (I wonder why the men don't see a problem with this?) have of the degrading images of women in porn?*

And a DEFINING TERM FOR WARREN... degrading images of women in porn are ones where the woman doesn't have control over her own body due to restraints of any type, or is being defecated and pissed on, or doing something EVERY TIME that most women do not wish to do in the bedroom EVERY TIME (i.e. cum shots to the face).

As an aside, I once tried to escalate a website to stop the processing of payments for a "gentlemen's club" in manhatten that "sponsored" young, provocatively-clad and posed female amputees (all had lost one leg above the knee) from old eastern European block countries. I was told that the payment processing company wouldn't be disassociating with that "club" as the guy in the acceptable use division couldn't see how this may be human trafficking. eh, silly me.