You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #29: Lots of smudges and false positives. True. But, other Agencies probably involved. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Lots of smudges and false positives. True. But, other Agencies probably involved.
Edited on Wed Oct-12-11 03:09 PM by leveymg
Looks like this whole thing has pretty much an amateur hour production. But, wasn't the lead-up to March 20, 2003, as well? But, nobody dared call the White House and Neocons on it at that time - so close to 9/11. Same MO runs through the whole string of incidents - botched counter-terrorism operations and political opportunism on the part of the usual suspects. This may run all the way back to the East African Embassy Bombings and the USS Cole attack - those were definitely not FBI. Another agency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC