Reply #29: Your post indicates that you should also consult an attorney, as your legal knowlege also seems

[msanthrope]

limited.

Injunctions and TROs are terms used interchangeably for the court order that the judge entered. (And you'll note that I used the term TRO elsewhere on the thread.) A 'temporary' order has the same legal effect of a permanent injunction--which means you are subject to the same legal penalties for disobedience.

If you think that disobedience of a 'temporary' order won't land you in as much trouble as disobedience of a 'permanent' one, I suggest that you contact an attorney to rethink your flawed legal conclusion.

Please understand that one of the most important considerations in the grant of the TRO is the likelihood that the Plantiffs will prevail at trial. That means your school district is going to win this case.

As to your point that you are without a contract--in my legal opinion, you are incorrect. You may not realize this, but you live in an evergreen public contract state. Which means that your contract, and its terms--remain in effect. You are still under the same legal obligation to work that you were before August 31st.

If you don't believe me, consult an attorney in your state--not a union official.

I suspect that tomorrow's court hearing will not go well for the union. Perhaps trespassing upon his property was a bad idea.